LEADER 01556cam0-22004451--450- 001 990008273100403321 005 20160828213152.0 035 $a000827310 035 $aFED01000827310 035 $a(Aleph)000827310FED01 035 $a000827310 100 $a20060214g17411748km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $alat 140 $aa-------------------bb0----- 200 1 $aAugustini Leyseri ... Meditationes ad pandectas quibus praecipua juis capita ex antiquitate explicantur, cum iuribus recentioribus conferuntur, atque variis celebrium collegiorum responsis et rebus iudicatis illustrantur. Volumen 1. [-11. et ultimum] 205 $aEditio tertia correctior 210 $aLipsiae$capud Joh. Christoph. Meisnerum$d1741-1748 215 $a11 v.$d4° 620 $aGermania.$dLipsia 700 1$aLeyser,$bAugustin : von$0499737 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aAQ 912 $a990008273100403321 952 $aV Ob 27 (1)$b4271$fFGBC 952 $aV Ob 27 (2)$b4271$fFGBC 952 $aV Ob 27 (3)$b4271$fFGBC 952 $aV Ob 27 (4)$b4271$fFGBC 952 $aV Ob 27 (5)$b4271$fFGBC 952 $aV Ob 27 (6)$b4271$fFGBC 952 $aV Ob 28 (1)$b70527$fFGBC 952 $aV Ob 28 (2)$b70527$fFGBC 952 $aV Ob 28 (3)$b70527$fFGBC 952 $aV Ob 28 (4)$b70527$fFGBC 952 $aV Ob 28 (5)$b70527$fFGBC 952 $aV Ob 28 (6)$b70527$fFGBC 952 $aV Ob 28 (7)$b70527$fFGBC 952 $aV Ob 28 (8)$b70527$fFGBC 952 $aV Ob 28 (9)$b70527$fFGBC 959 $aFGBC 997 $aUNINA LEADER 10319nam 2200769Ia 450 001 9910975097903321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a9786612104695 010 $a9781282104693 010 $a1282104691 010 $a9789027290878 010 $a9027290873 024 7 $a10.1075/cvs.6 035 $a(CKB)1000000000579501 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000130219 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11131728 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000130219 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10082481 035 $a(PQKB)10856683 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC622371 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL622371 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10269358 035 $a(OCoLC)432993367 035 $a(DE-B1597)721083 035 $a(DE-B1597)9789027290878 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000579501 100 $a20080814d2008 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aControversy and confrontation $erelating controversy analysis with argumentation theory /$fedited by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJohn Benjamins Pub.$dc2008 215 $axiii, 278 p. $cill 225 1 $aControversies,$x1574-1583 ;$vv. 6 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 08$a9789027218865 311 08$a9027218862 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aControversy and Confrontation -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC data -- Table of contents -- Preface -- List of contributors -- Controversy and confrontation in argumentative discourse -- 1. Controversies as argumentative confrontations -- 2. Argumentative confrontations in a dialectical perspective -- 3. Connections between argumentation theory and the analysis of controversies -- 4. Exploring the prospects of joint efforts -- References -- Dichotomies and types of debate -- 1. Introduction* -- 2. Dichotomy and division -- 3. Plato's predicament -- 4. Dichotomies as strategic argumentative tools -- 5. Dichotomization and de-dichotomization in debate -- 5.1 Natural right vs. historicism -- 5.2 Fact vs. value -- 5.3 Combining dichotomization with de-dichotomization? -- 6. Dichotomization at the meta-level -- 7. De-dichotomization at the meta-level -- 8. Re-dichotomizing a de-dichotomized triad? -- References -- Charles Darwin versus George Mivart -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Analytical tools -- 3. The concrete case -- 3.1 The problems -- 3.1.1 Darwin's problem -- 3.1.2 Mivart's problem -- 3.2 Answers -- 3.2.1 Darwin's answer -- 3.2.2 Mivart's answer -- 3.3 Motivations -- 3.3.1 Darwin's motivations -- 3.3.2 Mivart's motivations -- 3.4 Presuppositions -- 3.4.1 Darwin's presuppositions -- 3.4.2 Mivart's presuppositions -- 3.5 General argument -- 3.5.1 Darwin's general argument -- 3.5.2 Mivart's argument -- 3.6 Argumentative strategies -- 3.6.1 Darwin's argumentative strategies -- 3.6.2 Mivart's argumentative strategies -- 3.7 Objections and responses -- 3.7.1 Mivart's objections -- 3.7.2 Darwin's responses -- 4. Conclusion -- References -- Scientific demarcation and metascience -- 1. The NAS and the Nature of Science -- 2. Climate change science in a metascientific vacuum: A hermeneutical thought experiment -- References. 327 $aReforming the Jews, rejecting marginalization -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The debate -- 3. Friedländer's arguments -- 3.1 The critique -- 3.2 The project -- 3.3 Vern?nftelei: Conversion and the "sophistic" rejection of religious ceremonies -- 4. Teller's answer: A polite rebuttal -- 5. Schleiermacher's refutation -- 5.1 The death of judaism -- 6. The freedom of religious choice -- 7. Controversy and debate in the age of reason: Strategies and realities -- References -- Communication principles for controversies -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Types of communication principles -- 3. Properties of communication principles and their contexts of application -- 4. The principle of point-by-point refutation -- 5. Politeness principles -- 6. Conclusion -- References -- On the role of pragmatics, rhetoric and dialectic in scientific controversies -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The model -- 3. The pragmatic, rhetorical and dialectical uses of natural language in the practice of science -- 4. An example of scientific controversy -- 5. Concluding remarks -- References -- A "dialectic ladder" of refutation and dissuasion -- 1. Introduction* -- 2. Refutation and dissuasion in conflict situations -- 3. The Dissuasion Model -- 4. Culmination and crisis of the Dissuasion Model -- 5. A reforming ladder -- 6. Conclusion -- References -- Responding to objections -- 1. Background: The Intuition* -- 2. Possible ways of responding to an objection -- 3. The identity of an argument -- 4. Some examples -- 5. The fertility of an argument -- 6. Conclusion -- References -- Pragmatic inconsistency and credibility -- 1. Introduction* -- 2. Critical discussion -- 3. Inconsistency in a critical discussion -- 4. Rhetorical and dialectical aims in argumentative practice -- 5. Inconsistency in argumentative practice -- 6. Three uses of pointing out a pragmatic inconsistency. 327 $a7. Pointing out a pragmatic inconsistency as a form of strategic manoeuvring -- 8. Soundness conditions -- 9. Conclusion -- References -- Reasonableness in confrontation -- 1. Aims -- 2. The conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules -- 3. The unreasonableness of ad hominem fallacies -- 4. The strategy of convergent operationalism -- 4.1 The first method: Adding ad hominem indicators -- 4.2 The second method: Manipulation of discussion contexts -- 4.3 The third method: Justifications of reasonableness judgments -- 4.4 The fourth method: Fallacious vs. non-fallacious personal attacks -- 4.5 The fifth method: A statistical removal of the co-variate politeness -- 5. An exploration: The relationship between reasonableness and persuasiveness -- References -- Managing disagreement space in multiparty deliberation -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Background and analytic approach -- 2.1 The setting -- 2.2 The opening speech -- 2.3 Disagreement management -- 2.4 Commitments and obligations in proposing -- 2.5 Initiating and completing proposals -- 3. Analysis -- 3.1 Expanding disagreement in multi-party deliberation -- 3.2 Summary -- 3.3 Managing disagreement expansion in multiparty deliberation -- 3.4 Orienting to patterns for reasoning about proposals -- 3.5 Framing interaction and the meeting event -- 3.6 Re-framing the opening speech as an incomplete proposal -- 4. Discussion and conclusion -- References -- Predicaments of politicization in the debate over abstinence-only sex education -- 1. Theoretical background -- 2. Predicaments -- 3. Case study: The controversy over the "science of abstinence" -- 3.1 Section by section commentary -- 3.2 Marburger's case -- 3.3 Managing the disagreement space around abstinence-only sex education -- 3.4 Managing the "politicization" disagreement space. 327 $a3.5 The complexity of interlocking disagreement spaces -- 4. Conclusion -- References -- Rhetoric of science, pragma-dialectics, and science studies -- 1. Science studies and rhetoric of science -- 2. Pera's 'rhetoric' of science -- 3. The pragma-dialectical potential for science studies -- 4. Terrains of applicability -- 5. Conclusion -- References -- Scientific controversies and the pragma-dialectical model -- 1. Incorporating argument-analysis into the study of scientific debates* -- 2. Background to the Newton-Lucas correspondence -- 3. Rhetorical accounts of the controversy -- 4. Shortcomings of rhetorical approaches and advantages of dialectical models -- 5. The reconstruction and analysis of Lucas' first letter: The issues -- 6. Earlier evaluations of Lucas's critique -- 7. Evaluating evaluations of historians -- 7.1 Issue (1): The elongation of the image -- 7.2 Issue (2): The shape of the image -- 7.3 Issue (3): The Newtonian theory -- 7.4 The role of experiments -- 7.5 Benefits of a detailed reconstruction -- 8. Newton's first answer -- 8.1 Responding to issues (1) and (2): Taking up the challenge -- 8.2 Difficulties of incorporating rhetorical insights in the pragma-dialectical model -- 9. Not responding to issue (3): Newton's manoeuvring -- 9.1 Radical contextualization of methodology -- 9.2 The opening stage - a precursor to the argumentation stage? -- 10. Conclusion -- References -- Index -- The series Controversies. 330 $aThe essays that are collected in Controversy and Confrontation provide a closer insight into the relationship between controversy and confrontation that deepens our understanding of the functioning of argumentative discourse in managing differences of opinion. Their authors stem from two backgrounds. First, the controversy scholars Dascal, Marras, Euli, Regner, Ferreira, and Lessl discuss historical controversies in science, both from a theoretical and an empirical perspective; Saim concentrates on a historical controversy; Fritz provides a historical perspective on controversies by analyzing communication principles. Second the argumentation scholars Johnson, van Laar, van Eemeren, Garssen and Meuffels address theoretical or empirical aspects of argumentative confrontation; Aakhus and Vasilyeva examine argumentative discourse from the perspective of conversation analysis; Jackson analyzes argumentative confrontation in a recent debate between scientists and politicians. Last but not least, two contributors, Kutrovátz and Zemplén, make an attempt to bridge the study of historical controversy and the study of argumentation. 410 0$aControversies ;$vv. 6. 606 $aDebates and debating 606 $aLogic 606 $aPersuasion (Rhetoric) 606 $aPragmatics 606 $aReasoning 615 0$aDebates and debating. 615 0$aLogic. 615 0$aPersuasion (Rhetoric) 615 0$aPragmatics. 615 0$aReasoning. 676 $a808.53 701 $aEemeren$b F. H. van$g(Frans Hendrik),$f1946-$0850183 701 $aGarssen$b Bart$01799982 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910975097903321 996 $aControversy and confrontation$94346940 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02926nam 2200685zu 450 001 9910133548603321 005 20210807004429.0 010 $a2-86906-330-X 024 7 $a10.4000/books.pufr.3024 035 $a(CKB)3390000000053681 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001542225 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11810002 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001542225 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11535727 035 $a(PQKB)10742019 035 $a(WaSeSS)IndRDA00046247 035 $a(FrMaCLE)OB-pufr-3024 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/62183 035 $a(PPN)182829049 035 $a(oapen)doab62183 035 $a(EXLCZ)993390000000053681 100 $a20160829d2003 uy 101 0 $afre 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aVilles rattachées, villes reconfigurées, XVIe-XXe siècles 210 $cPresses universitaires François-Rabelais$d2003 210 31$a[Place of publication not identified]$cPresses universitaires François Rabelais$d2003 215 $a1 online resource (434 pages) 225 1 $aPerspectives Historiques ;$vNombre 4 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 08$a2-86906-170-6 330 $aUne ville " rattachée " à une nouvelle souveraineté est toujours une ville " reconfigurée ". Des débuts de l'époque moderne aux événements les plus contemporains, en Europe et sur le pourtour de la Méditerranée, les bouleversements politiques internationaux ont donné forme aux villes, les ont modelées et marquées de leurs empreintes successives. Sur les trois aspects privilégiés dans cet ouvrage - la reconfiguration des réseaux sociaux, la recomposition des espaces, l'évolution de la mémoire de la ville -, les regards croisés d'historiens, d'historiens d'art et de praticiens de la ville mettent en lumière les diverses stratégies d'intégration, d'appropriation et de réinvention des sociétés urbaines qui ont vécu ce passage d'une souveraineté à une autre. 410 0$aCollection Perspectives historiques ;$vNombre 4. 606 $aSociology & Social History$2HILCC 606 $aSocial Sciences$2HILCC 606 $aCommunities - Urban Groups$2HILCC 610 $aStrasbourg 610 $aHéliopolis 610 $aEmpire ottoman 610 $aRome 610 $aréseau social 610 $aBerlin 610 $aTripoli 610 $aRabat 610 $aélites urbaines 610 $aAdriatique 610 $arattachement 615 7$aSociology & Social History 615 7$aSocial Sciences 615 7$aCommunities - Urban Groups 700 $aDenise Turrel (dir.)$4auth$01357141 702 $aTurrel$b Denise 801 0$bPQKB 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910133548603321 996 $aVilles rattachées, villes reconfigurées, XVIe-XXe siècles$93362551 997 $aUNINA