LEADER 02903oam  2200625   450 
001 9910133476503321
005 20221206104417.0
010   $a2-84788-434-3
024 7 $a10.4000/books.enseditions.1058
035   $a(CKB)3390000000053535
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001110832
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12502458
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001110832
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11130429
035   $a(PQKB)10309529
035   $a(FrMaCLE)OB-enseditions-1058
035   $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/54716
035   $a(PPN)180611534
035   $a(EXLCZ)993390000000053535
100   $a20160829d2009      uy             |
101 0 $afre
135   $au|bu#---uuuuu
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 13$aLe nom propre en Inde $econsidérations sur le mécanisme référentiel /$fÉmilie Aussant
210   $cENS Éditions$d2009
210 31$aFrance :$cENS,$d2009
215   $a1 online resource (163 pages ) $cdigital file(s)
225 1 $aLangages Le nom propre en Inde
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311 08$aPrint version: 9782847881769 
330   $aThrough the study of numerous Sanskrit technical texts, the present study aims to show and explain how the specificity of the semiotic status of proper names has been approached in the three traditional Indian disciplines of vy ? kara ? a (grammar), the ny at are (logical) and m ? m at m s at (exegesis), disciplines that put the reflection on language at the centre of their concerns. The question of the "meaning" of proper names has given rise to many reflections, both in the West and in India.If the debates, in the West, mainly concern logic and philosophy, linguistics participating only marginally, it is primarily grammarians ( vaiy à kara ? a ) and logicians ( naiy à yika ) who, in India, got hold of the problem. This work shows how the former mostly defended the idea that proper nouns denote and connote, while among the latter, it is the idea of ??a direct denotation, without connotation, which was most often supported.
606   $aNames, Personal$zIndia
606   $aNames, Sanskrit
606   $aRelated Historical Sciences$2HILCC
606   $aHistory & Archaeology$2HILCC
606   $aGenealogy$2HILCC
610   $anom propre
610   $aconvention linguistique
610   $alangues indiennes
610   $aréférence (linguistique)
610   $asanskrit
615  0$aNames, Personal
615  0$aNames, Sanskrit
615  7$aRelated Historical Sciences
615  7$aHistory & Archaeology
615  7$aGenealogy
700   $aAussant$b Émilie$0872194
801  0$bPQKB
801  2$bUkMaJRU
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910133476503321
996   $aLe nom propre en Inde$91947284
997   $aUNINA