LEADER 03314 am 22005893u 450 001 9910132649803321 005 20230621135748.0 010 $a1-921862-42-4 035 $a(CKB)3680000000164676 035 $a(EBL)4612353 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000764507 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11943336 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000764507 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10789597 035 $a(PQKB)11605090 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4612353 035 $a(WaSeSS)Ind00043607 035 $a(EXLCZ)993680000000164676 100 $a20120724h20112011 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn#---|||uu 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aLaw's anthropology $efrom ethnography to expert testimony in native title /$fPaul Burke 210 1$aActon, A.C.T. :$cANU E Press,$d[2011] 210 4$dİ2011 215 $a1 online resource (336 pages) $cdigital file(s) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$aPrint version: 9781921862427 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 281-319) and index. 327 $aPreliminary; Acknowledgments; Lists of Maps, Tables and Figures; 1. Towards an Ethnography of Anthropology's Encounter with Modern Law; 2. Anthropological Knowledge of the Murray Islands Prior to the Mabo Case; 3. Beckett in Mabo; 4. The Anthropology of the Broome Region; 5. The Anthropology of Broome on Trial; 6. The Enigma of Traditional Western Desert Land Tenure; 7. Western Desert Ethnography on Trial; 8. Apocalypse Yulara? The emergence of a judicial discourse of 'junk' anthropology; 9. Conclusion; Bibliography; Index 330 $aAnthropologists have been appearing as key expert witnesses in native title claims for over 20 years. Until now, however, there has been no theoretically-informed, detailed investigation of how the expert testimony of anthropologists is formed and how it is received by judges. This book examines the structure and habitus of both the field of anthropology and the juridical field and how they have interacted in four cases, including the original hearing in the Mabo case. The analysis of background material has been supplemented by interviews with the key protagonists in each case. This allows the reader a unique, insider's perspective of the courtroom drama that unfolds in each case. The book asks, given the available ethnographic research, how will the anthropologist reconstruct it in a way that is relevant to the legal doctrine of native title when that doctrine gives a wide leeway for interpretation on the critical questions. 606 $aEvidence, Expert$zAustralia 606 $aForensic anthropology$zAustralia 606 $aAboriginal Australians$xLegal status, laws, etc 606 $aNative title (Australia) 615 0$aEvidence, Expert 615 0$aForensic anthropology 615 0$aAboriginal Australians$xLegal status, laws, etc. 615 0$aNative title (Australia) 676 $a346.9404320899915 686 $a347.9625$2moys 700 $aBurke$b Paul$f1956-$0987771 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bUkMaJRU 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910132649803321 996 $aLaw's anthropology$92258339 997 $aUNINA