LEADER 05645nam 2200733 450 001 9910132231303321 005 20230803201941.0 010 $a1-118-58400-7 010 $a1-118-58401-5 035 $a(CKB)3710000000093467 035 $a(EBL)1650825 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001133052 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11725659 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001133052 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11157651 035 $a(PQKB)11207257 035 $a(OCoLC)874321757 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1650825 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1650825 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10849266 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL584457 035 $a(OCoLC)859168767 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000093467 100 $a20140326h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aTemporality $euniversals and variation /$fMaria Bittner 210 1$aChichester, England :$cWiley-Blackwell,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (350 p.) 225 1 $aExplorations in Semantics 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-4051-9040-X 311 $a1-4051-9039-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $aCover; Title Page; Copyright; Contents; Part I Semantic Universals; 1 Direct Semantic Composition; 1.1 Simple Type Logic (TL0); 1.2 A CG.TL0 Fragment of English; 1.3 Dynamic Type Logic (DL0); 1.4 A CG.DL0 Fragment of English; 1.5 Centering: A Blind Spot of English-Based Logics; 2 Nominal Reference with Centering; 2.1 Center v. Periphery: Anaphora to Structured Lists; 2.2 Kalaallisut Third Person Inflections as Top-Level Anaphora; 2.3 Mandarin Third Person Features as Top-Level Anaphora; 2.4 English Third Person Pronouns as Shallow Anaphora; 2.5 Simple Update with Centering (UC0) 327 $a3 Tense as Temporal Centering3.1 Polish Third Person Inflections as Top-Level Anaphora; 3.2 Polish Tenses as Top-Level Temporal Reference; 3.3 English Tenses as Temporal (In)definites; 3.4 English Tenses as Top-Level Temporal Reference; 3.5 UC0 with Temporal Centering (UC?); 4 Aspect as Eventuality Centering; 4.1 Polish Aspect Features v. Inflections; 4.2 Mandarin Aspect Features v. Particles; 4.3 English Aspectual Auxiliaries; 4.4 UC? with Mereology (UC?+); 5 Quantification as Reference to Sets; 5.1 Nominal Quantification and Anaphora; 5.2 Nominal Quantification and Temporal Reference 327 $a5.3 Temporal Quantification and Anaphora5.4 UC?+ with Discourse Referents for Sets (UC?&#?2225;); 6 Mood as Illocutionary Centering; 6.1 Illocutionary Moods with(out) Reportative Recentering; 6.2 (Not-)at-Issue Content as Modal Discourse Reference; 6.3 (Not-)at-Issue with Start-Up Illocutionary Referents; 6.4 Dependent Moods as Perspectival (Re)centering; 6.5 UC????????? with Illocutionary Referents (UC??????????); 7 (In)direct Speech and Attitude Reports; 7.1 Mood with(out) Reportative Recentering Revisited; 7.2 At-Issue Reports with Finite Complements; 7.3 At-Issue Reports with Non-Finite Complements 327 $a7.4 UC: Combining UC?&#?2225; and UC??????????Part II Temporal Variation; 8 Tense-Based Temporality in English; 8.1 Indexical Past with(out) Recentering Aspect; 8.2 Indexical Non-Past with(out) Recentering Aspect; 8.3 Reports: Speaker's View of Subject's (Non-)Past; 8.4 Quantification: Tenses in Distributive Contexts; 8.5 A CG.UC Fragment of English; 9 Tense-Aspect-Based Temporality in Polish; 9.1 Relative Past (Im)perfective; 9.2 Relative Non-Past (Im)perfective; 9.3 Reports: Subject's (Non-)Past; 9.4 Quantification: Distributed (Im)perfectives; 9.5 A CG.UC Fragment of Polish 327 $a10 Aspect-Based Temporality in Mandarin10.1 Non-Future: Verifiable Topic State; 10.2 Future: Prospective Topic State or Comment; 10.3 Reports: Attitudinal Topic State or Comment; 10.4 Quantification: Topical Habit or Distributive Comment; 10.5 A CG.UC Fragment of Mandarin; 11 Mood-Based Temporality in Kalaallisut; 11.1 Non-Future: Verifiable Eventualities; 11.2 Future: Verifiable Eventualities with Future c-Points; 11.3 Reports: Verifiability from Agent's Perspective; 11.4 Quantification: Verifiable Habits; 11.5 A CG.UC Fragment of Kalaallisut; Conclusion; Bibliography; Author Index 327 $aSubject Index 330 $a Temporality surveys the ways in which languages of different types refer to past, present, and future events, through an in-depth examination of four major language types: tense-based English, tense-aspect-based Polish, aspect-based Chinese, and mood-based Kalaallisut. Cutting-edge research on directly compositional dynamic semantics of languages with and without grammatical tenseNew in-depth analysis of temporal, aspectual, modal, as well as nominal discourse referencePresents a novel logical language for representing linguistic meaning (Update with Cent 410 0$aExplorations in semantics. 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xTemporal constructions 606 $aLinguistic universals 606 $aLanguage and languages$xVariation 606 $aSemantics 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xTemporal constructions. 615 0$aLinguistic universals. 615 0$aLanguage and languages$xVariation. 615 0$aSemantics. 676 $a415 686 $aLAN016000$2bisacsh 700 $aBittner$b Maria$0183615 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910132231303321 996 $aTemporality$91992041 997 $aUNINA