LEADER 05656nam 2200709 450 001 9910132227703321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-118-92066-X 010 $a1-118-92061-9 035 $a(CKB)3710000000093494 035 $a(EBL)1650852 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001212114 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11693806 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001212114 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11225444 035 $a(PQKB)10761943 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1650852 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1650852 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10849303 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL584590 035 $a(OCoLC)874321907 035 $a(PPN)192687433 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000093494 100 $a20140327h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aInformation systems for knowledge management /$fedited by Ine?s Saad, Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux, Faiez Gargouri 210 1$aLondon, England ;$aHoboken, New Jersey :$cISTE :$cWiley,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (326 p.) 225 0 $aCognitive Science and Knowledge Management Series 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-84821-664-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. 327 $aCover; Title Page; Contents; Chapter 1. Assessing the Community Maturity from a Knowledge Management Perspective; 1.1. Introduction; 1.2. Background; 1.2.1. Maturity models; 1.2.2. Knowledge-oriented maturity models; 1.3. Method; 1.4. The CoMM; 1.4.1. The development; 1.4.2. The description; 1.5. Application within a CKO professional association; 1.5.1. Overview of need; 1.5.2. Field application steps; 1.5.3. Findings; 1.5.4. Reflection on the field application of CoMM; 1.6. Discussion and implications; 1.7. Conclusion; 1.8. Bibliography; 1.9. Appendix 327 $aChapter 2 Social Networks: Leveraging User Social Data to Empower Collective Intelligence2.1. Introduction; 2.2. Collective intelligence by user-centered social network aggregation; 2.3. Related works; 2.4. Proposed system; 2.4.1. User-centered social network aggregation; 2.4.2. Personalized information filtering; 2.4.3. Collaborative knowledge management; 2.5. Decision support; 2.6. Use scenario; 2.7. Prototype; 2.8. Conclusions and future work; 2.9. Acknowledgments; 2.10. Bibliography; Chapter 3 Sociocultural Knowledge Management toward the Adaptation of a CSCL Environment 327 $a3.1. Introduction3.2. The concept of culture and sociocultural factors; 3.2.1. Culture in ethnology; 3.2.2. Culture in psychology; 3.2.3. Cultural properties; 3.2.4. Models of national culture; 3.2.5. Discussion; 3.3. The relation between sociocultural human characteristics, KM and CSCL; 3.3.1. CSCL and knowledge sharing; 3.3.2. Culture, human mind and KM; 3.3.3. Discussion; 3.4. Sociocultural considerations in collaborative environments; 3.4.1. Study of existing culturally sensitive tools; 3.4.2. Limitations and findings; 3.5. The proposed ontology-based sociocultural user profile 327 $a3.6. The conceptual ontology framework based adaptation approach3.7. The sociocultural aware KM system for CSCL; 3.8. Conclusion and ongoing work; 3.9. Bibliography; Chapter 4 An Argumentation-based Rough Set Theory for Knowledge Management; 4.1. Introduction; 4.2. Background; 4.2.1. Dominance-based rough set approach (DRSA); 4.2.2. Argumentation; 4.2.3. Multiagent system; 4.3. Related work; 4.4. Multiagent argumentative approach; 4.4.1. Interaction protocol; 4.4.2. Arguments; 4.4.3. Argument and counter-argument evaluation; 4.4.4. Counter-argument construction; 4.5. Example; 4.6. Conclusion 327 $a4.7. BibliographyChapter 5 Considering Tacit Knowledge When Bridging Knowledge Management and Information Systems for Collaborative Decision-Making; 5.1. Introduction; 5.2. Background theory; 5.2.1. A vision of knowledge within the organization; 5.2.2. Ethnographic workplace study: participation as a means to observe; 5.2.3. Incommensurability: when communication breaks down; 5.3. Proposition; 5.3.1. Fieldwork through participant observation; 5.3.2. Highlighting evidences and levels with ISO/IEC 15504; 5.3.3. Rating the attributes and assessing tacit knowledge consideration; 5.4. Case study 327 $a5.4.1. Describing the field 330 $aMore and more organizations are becoming aware of the importance of tacit and explicit knowledge owned by their members which corresponds to their experience and accumulated knowledge about the firm activities. However, considering the large amount of knowledge created and used in the organization, especially with the evolution of information and communications technologies, the firm must first determine the specific knowledge on which it is necessary to focus. Creating activities to enhance identification, preservation, and use of this knowledge is a powerful mean to improve the level of econ 410 0$aISTE 606 $aInformation resources management 606 $aKnowledge management 606 $aInformation technology$xManagement 615 0$aInformation resources management. 615 0$aKnowledge management. 615 0$aInformation technology$xManagement. 676 $a658.4038011 702 $aSaad$b Ine?s 702 $aRosenthal-Sabroux$b Camille 702 $aGargouri$b Faiez 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910132227703321 996 $aInformation systems for knowledge management$92042248 997 $aUNINA