LEADER 03034 am 22006613u 450 001 9910131522803321 005 20230621141314.0 010 $a9789616842440$b(ebook) 035 $a(CKB)3710000000499517 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001680309 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16496238 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001680309 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)15028421 035 $a(PQKB)10217718 035 $a(WaSeSS)IndRDA00057812 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/27235 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000499517 100 $a20160829d2015 uy | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurm|#|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aEvidence in civil law $eAustria /$fBettina Nunner-Krautgasser [and] Philipp Anzenberger 210 $cInstitute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor$d2015 210 31$aSlovenia :$cInstitute for Local Self Government and Public Procurement Maribor,$d2015 215 $a1 online resource (59 pages) 225 1 $aLaw & Society 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 330 $aThis report outlines the rules on the taking and using of evidence in Austrian civil procedure law. On the basis of principles such as the free disposition of parties, the attenuated inquisitorial principle or the principles of orality and directness, the judge and the parties form a ?working group? when investigating the matter in dispute. The Austrian concept of an active judge, however, goes along with the judge?s duty to do case-management and especially to induce a truthful fact-finding using judicial discretion. While only five means of proof (documents, witnesses, expert opinions, evidence by inspection and the examination of parties) are explicitly listed the Austrian civil procedure code, there is no numerus clausus regarding the means of evidence. Evidence may be freely assessed by the judge. 410 0$aLaw & society. 606 $aLaw, General & Comparative$2HILCC 606 $aLaw, Politics & Government$2HILCC 610 $aburden of proof 610 $awitness evidence 610 $aprinciples of taking evidence 610 $aevidence by inspection 610 $aexpert opinions 610 $ageneral principles of civil procedure 610 $aexamination of parties 610 $aunlawful evidence 610 $adocumentary evidence 610 $ataking evidence in civil procedure 610 $aCounterparty 610 $aLegal remedy 610 $aLetters rogatory 610 $aTrial court 610 $aVideotelephony 615 7$aLaw, General & Comparative 615 7$aLaw, Politics & Government 700 $aNunner-Krautgasser$b Bettina$0994706 702 $aAnzenberger$b Philipp 801 0$bPQKB 801 2$bUkMaJRU 912 $a9910131522803321 996 $aEvidence in civil law$92278263 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02336nam 2200349z- 450 001 9910346803803321 005 20251006161956.0 035 $a(CKB)4920000000095550 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/46086 035 $a(oapen)doab46086 035 $a(EXLCZ)994920000000095550 100 $a20202102d2016 |y 0 101 0 $aspa 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aEl origen de la bioe?tica como problema 210 $cPublicacions i Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona$d2016 215 $a1 online resource (192 p.) 225 1 $aCol·lecció de Bioètica 311 08$a84-475-3988-1 330 $a¿Do?nde y cua?ndo nacio? la bioe?tica? Tradicionalmente se ha atribuido la creacio?n del neologismo «bioe?tica» a Potter, en 1970, y su desarrollo a los jesuitas de la Universidad de Georgetown. Sin embargo, la cuestio?n es mucho ma?s compleja y supera ampliamente el contexto norteamericano, no solo porque se descubrio? que el alema?n Fritz Jahr ya habi?a acun?ado el te?rmino en los an?os veinte, sino porque la e?tica cli?nica tiene siglos de historia, y en todas las culturas y religiones se ha reflexionado sobre los problemas referentes a la salud, la vida y su ocaso. Al factor meramente histo?rico hemos de an?adir el ideolo?gico. «Bioe?tica» fue el te?rmino que emplearon algunos teo?logos para adoctrinar al personal sanitario conforme al dogma cato?lico en asuntos como la reproduccio?n y la eutanasia. Este intento de monopolizar materias tan sensibles provoco? como reaccio?n defensiva la incorporacio?n a la disciplina de corrientes de pensamiento feministas, laicistas y multiculturales. Por u?ltimo, la aceleracio?n de la biotecnologi?a y el temor a las consecuencias de la manipulacio?n del genoma de los seres vivos terminaron de consolidar la bioe?tica como campo de conocimiento plural y multidisciplinar. 606 $aMedicine and Nursing$2bicssc 610 $aBioethics 610 $aBioe?tica 615 7$aMedicine and Nursing 700 $aLo?pez Baroni$b Manuel Jesu?s$4auth$01851036 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910346803803321 996 $aEl origen de la bioe?tica como problema$94444290 997 $aUNINA