LEADER 03936 am 22006493u 450 001 9910131518303321 005 20230621140041.0 010 $a9789616842587$b(ebook) 035 $a(CKB)3710000000499604 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001680331 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16496377 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001680331 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)15028466 035 $a(PQKB)10865916 035 $a(WaSeSS)IndRDA00057859 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/39209 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000499604 100 $a20160829d2015 uy | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurm|#|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aEvidence in civil law $eSlovenia /$fTja?a Ivanc 210 $cInstitute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor$d2015 210 31$aSlovenia :$cInstitute for Local Self Government and Public Procurement Maribor,$d2015 215 $a1 online resource (ii, 111 pages) 225 1 $aLaw & Society 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 330 $aUnder the Article 22 of the Slovenian Constitution the right to equal protection of rights guarantees the right to state the facts and submit evidence, the right to be present at the taking of evidence and to be informed on the results of the taking of evidence. The principle of free assessment is a fundamental principle in Slovenian civil procedure included in Article 8 of the CPA. In the system of free assessment the judge is the one to evaluate the evidence without being bound by any formal rules on probative value of certain evidence. Probative value depends only on individual belief or conviction of the trial judge in each matter separately. The free assessment of evidence is the right and duty of the court to assess each piece of evidence separately and collectively. In the evidence-taking stage the CPA includes the special rules for each type of evidence, meant as a minimum guarantee for the right free assessment of the taken evidence and the free assessment of evidence presupposes that the evidence were taken by this rules. Even though, court decides which evidence will be produced for determination of the ultimate facts, the court is bound by the parties? right to propose evidence ? with their procedural burden of proof. If the court rejects the proposal of a certain piece of evidence this rejections must be explained. In the following book the author discusses the key principles of the law of evidence in Slovenian civil procedure. The book provides analysis of the law of evidence, while placing the subject within its theoretical context. The subject is presented in a logical structure following on from the introduction of the basic principles through the rules for burden of proof, types of evidence, costs of evidence, the question of unlawful evidence, and the cross-border taking of evidence. 410 0$aLaw & society. 606 $aLaw - Europe, except U.K$2HILCC 606 $aLaw - Non-U.S$2HILCC 606 $aLaw, Politics & Government$2HILCC 610 $aburden of proof 610 $across border taking of evidence 610 $aslovenia 610 $aevidence taking 610 $aregulation no 1208/2001 on taking evidence 610 $ameans of evidence 610 $acivil procedure law 610 $alaw of evidence 610 $afundamental principles 610 $aDefendant 610 $aExpert witness 610 $aLetters rogatory 610 $aPlaintiff 615 7$aLaw - Europe, except U.K. 615 7$aLaw - Non-U.S. 615 7$aLaw, Politics & Government 700 $aIvanc$b Tjasa$0864637 801 0$bPQKB 801 2$bUkMaJRU 912 $a9910131518303321 996 $aEvidence in civil law$91929959 997 $aUNINA