LEADER 03085 am 22005653u 450 001 9910130886203321 005 20230621142719.0 035 $a(CKB)3450000000003046 035 $a(MH)012590674-9 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000985969 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11533982 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000985969 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10933535 035 $a(PQKB)10850613 035 $a(OCoLC)808385708 035 $a(WaSeSS)Ind00074056 035 $a(EXLCZ)993450000000003046 100 $a20101124h20102010 uy 0 101 0 $ager 135 $aurcn#nnn||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aKonzert und Konkurrenz $edie Künste und ihre Wissenschaften im 19. Jahrhundert /$fChristian Scholl, Sandra Richter, Oliver Huck (Hg.) 210 1$aGöttingen :$cUniversitätsverlag Göttingen,$d2010. 210 4$dİ2010 215 $a1 online resource (293 pages) $cillustrations; digital, PDF file(s) 225 0 $aOpen Access e-Books 225 0 $aKnowledge Unlatched 300 $aPapers presented at a conference held in Göttingen during 19-21 May, 2006. 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 330 $aThis volume focuses on the double competition that is typical of the art sciences (art, music and literature) in the 19th century: the competition between the sciences themselves, which feeds on the competition of their arts. According to the underlying hypothesis, the respective art science derives its validity and rank from the general appreciation of its reference art. In this way, the arts and their sciences find themselves in a mutually intensifying competition, which finds expression in numerous debates about the respective leading art. The contributions collected here in an interdisciplinary manner open up the processes of historical differentiation and homogenization from different perspectives, in connection with which the competition of the arts and their sciences took place in the 19th century. The question that unites them aims at the basics of understanding art and the basics of the self-understanding of art science. Last but not least, it is about showing to what extent the premises that were developed to justify the disciplines still claim validity - directly through their disciplinary canonization and indirectly even through the broken effectiveness of the scientific master stories that produced them. 606 $aArts$y19th century$xHistory$vCongresses 606 $aArt criticism$xHistory$y19th century$vCongresses 606 $aArts$xHistory$y19th century 615 0$aArts$xHistory 615 0$aArt criticism$xHistory 615 0$aArts$xHistory 676 $a701.1809034 702 $aScholl$b Christian$f1971-, 702 $aRichter$b Sandra$f1973-, 702 $aHuck$b Oliver 801 0$bNyNyMAR 801 1$bNyNyMAR 801 2$bAuAdUSA 801 2$bUkMaJRU 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910130886203321 996 $aKonzert und Konkurrenz$92278258 997 $aUNINA