LEADER 00861nam0-2200289---450- 001 990009692140403321 005 20130308132115.0 035 $a000969214 035 $aFED01000969214 035 $a(Aleph)000969214FED01 035 $a000969214 100 $a20130308d1965----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $ager 102 $aDE 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $aBeispiele zur Bodenmechanik$eAufsätze mit Formeln, Tafeln und Schaubildern$fKarl Fischer 210 $aVienna ; Berlino ; Monaco$cVerlag von Wilhelm Ernst & Sohn$d1965 215 $a52 p.$cill.$d28 cm 610 0 $aMeccanica delle terre 700 1$aFischer,$bKarl$0370582 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990009692140403321 952 $a15 GT-M/10-15$b772$fDINID 959 $aDINID 996 $aBeispiele zur Bodenmechanik$9843241 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02636nam 2200325z- 450 001 9911000392703321 005 20230906203136.0 010 $a1-000-15588-9 035 $a(CKB)4900000001303802 035 $a(BIP)053770556 035 $a(BIP)076774510 035 $a(VLeBooks)9781000155884 035 $a(EXLCZ)994900000001303802 100 $a20220316c2020uuuu -u- - 101 0 $aeng 200 $aOrigin and Significance of the Frankfurt School: A Marxist Perspective 205 $a1st 210 $cRoutledge 215 $a1 online resource (204 p.) 225 $aRoutledge Library Editions. Social Theory 311 $a1-138-97777-2 330 8 $aThe term 'Frankfurt School' is used widely, but sometimes loosely, to describe both a group of intellectuals and a specific social theory. Focusing on the formative and most radical years of the Frankfurt School, during the 1930s, this study concentrates on the Frankfurt School's most original contributions made to the work on a 'critical theory of society' by the philosophers Max Horkheimer and Herbert Marcuse, the psychologist Erich Fromm, and the aesthetician Theodor W. Adorno.Phil Slater traces the extent, and ultimate limits, of the Frankfurt School's professed relation to the Marxian critique of political economy. In considering the extent of the relation to revolutionary praxis, he discusses the socio-economic and political history of Weimar Germany in its descent into fascism, and considers the work of such people as Karl Korsch, Wilhelm Reich, Walter Benjamin and Bertolt Brecht, which directs a great deal of critical light on the Frankfurt School.While pinpointing the ultimate limitations of the Frankfurt School's frame of reference, Phil Slater also looks at the role their work played (largely against their wishes) in the emergence of the student anti-authoritarian movement in the 1960s. He shows that, in particular, the analysis of psychic and cultural manipulation was central to the young rebels' theoretical armour, but that even here, the lack of economic class analysis seriously restricts the critical edge of the Frankfurt School's theory. His conclusion is that the only way forward is to rescue the most radical roots of the Frankfurt School's work, and to recast these in the context of a practical theory of economic and political emancipation. 606 $aFrankfurt school of sociology 615 0$aFrankfurt school of sociology. 676 $a301.01 700 $aSlater$b Phil$0125279 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9911000392703321 996 $aOrigin and significance of the Frankfurt School$9194067 997 $aUNINA