LEADER 00760nam0-2200301---450- 001 990009529520403321 005 20120216101129.0 010 $a978-0-471-64988-5 035 $a000952952 035 $aFED01000952952 035 $a(Aleph)000952952FED01 035 $a000952952 100 $a20120216d2004----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aeng 102 $aUS 105 $aa---a---001yy 200 1 $aNanophotonics 210 $aHoboken, NJ$cWiley$d2004 215 $axv, 415 p.$cill.$d25 cm 610 0 $aNanofisica 700 1$aPrasad,$bParas N.$0515305 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990009529520403321 952 $a32G-028$bD.S.F. 9570$fFI1 959 $aFI1 996 $aNanophotonics$9855709 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04802nam 22006971 450 001 9910791913403321 005 20121004132546.0 010 $a1-84731-917-3 010 $a1-4725-6591-6 010 $a1-283-53956-X 010 $a9786613852014 010 $a1-84731-916-5 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472565914 035 $a(CKB)2560000000090543 035 $a(EBL)990459 035 $a(OCoLC)816497558 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000704681 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12278808 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000704681 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10705999 035 $a(PQKB)10955429 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1772883 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC990459 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1772883 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10589789 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL385201 035 $a(OCoLC)893331823 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09256462 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6165427 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL990459 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000090543 100 $a20140929d2012 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe concept of unity in public international law /$fMario Prost 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aOxford, U.K. ;$aPortland, OR :$cHart Publishing,$d2012. 215 $a1 online resource (226 p.) 225 1 $aHart monographs in transnational and international law ;$vv. 7 300 $a"The thesis on which the book is based won the 2009 prize for best doctoral thesis from the Association des professeurs de droit du Quebec"--Dust jacket. 311 $a1-84946-043-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aIntroduction -- Of unity, perspective and perception : an ontological preamble -- Unity, unification, universality : a terminological disambiguation -- Material unity -- Formal unity -- Cultural unity -- Logical unity -- General conclusion : Unitas multiplex. 330 $a"Fragmentation' has become a defining, albeit controversial, metaphor of international law scholarship in the era of globalisation. Some scholars see it as a new development, others as history repeating itself; some approach it as a technical issue and some as the reflection of deeper political struggles. But there is near-consensus about the fact that the established vision of international law as a unitary whole is under threat. At the core of the fragmentation debate lies the concept of unity, but this is hardly ever rationalised and is more assumed than explained. Its meaning remainFragmentation' has become a defining, albeit controversial, metaphor of international law scholarship in the era of globalisation. Some scholars see it as a new development, others as history repeating itself; some approach it as a technical issue and some as the reflection of deeper political struggles. But there is near-consensus about the fact that the established vision of international law as a unitary whole is under threat. At the core of the fragmentation debate lies the concept of unity, but this is hardly ever rationalised and is more assumed than explained. Its meaning remains vague and intuitive. 'The Concept of Unity in Public International Law' attempts to dispel that vagueness by exploring the various possible meanings of the concept of unity in international law. However, eschewing one grand theory of unity, it identifies and compares five candidates. Intentionally pluralistic in its outlook, the book does not engage in normative arguments about whether international law is or should be unitary but seeks to show instead that the concept of unity is contested and that discourses on fragmentation are necessarily contingent.s vague and intuitive. 'The Concept of Unity in Public International Law' attempts to dispel that vagueness by exploring the various possible meanings of the concept of unity in international law. However, eschewing one grand theory of unity, it identifies and compares five candidates. Intentionally pluralistic in its outlook, the book does not engage in normative arguments about whether international law is or should be unitary but seeks to show instead that the concept of unity is contested and that discourses on fragmentation are necessarily contingent."--Bloomsbury Publishing. 410 0$aHart monographs in transnational and international law ;$vv. 7. 606 $aInternational law$xPhilosophy 606 $aInternational law 606 $2International law 615 0$aInternational law$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aInternational law. 676 $a341.01 700 $aProst$b Mario$0524614 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910791913403321 996 $aConcept of Unity in Public International Law$9821989 997 $aUNINA