LEADER 02654nam 2200433 n 450 001 996391930903316 005 20200824121747.0 035 $a(CKB)4940000000107942 035 $a(EEBO)2240954038 035 $a(UnM)99862527e 035 $a(UnM)99862527 035 $a(EXLCZ)994940000000107942 100 $a19930106d1660 uy | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||a|bb| 200 14$aThe Covenanters plea against absolvers. Or, A modest discourse, shewing why those who in England & Scotland took the Solemn League and Covenant, cannot judge their consciences discharged from the obligation of it, by any thing heretofore said by the Oxford men; or lately by Dr Featly, Dr. Gauden, or any others$b[electronic resource] $eIn which also several cases relating to promisory oathes, and to the said Covenant in special, are spoken to, and determined by Scripture, reason, and the joynt suffrages of casuists. Contrary to the indigested notions of some late writers; yet much to the sense of the Reverend Dr. Sanderson$fWritten by Theophilus Timorcus a well-wisher to students in casuistical divinity 210 $aLondon $cprinted for T.B. and are to be sold in Westminster Hall and Pauls Church-yard$d1661. [i.e. 1660] 215 $a[24], 87, [1] p 300 $aAttributed to Richard Baxter, Thomas Gataker, and Richard Vines by John Brown in his "An apologeticall relation of the particular sufferings of the faithfull ministers & professours of the Church of Scotland, since August, 1660" (p. 379), though the second two died in 1654 and 1656 respectively. 300 $aThe first leaf contains "The portraiture of his sacred Majesty in his Solitudes, .. [quotation]". 300 $aAnnotation on Thomason copy: "Decemb. 17". 300 $aReproduction of the original in the British Library. 330 $aeebo-0018 606 $aCovenanters$vEarly works to 1800 606 $aOaths$vEarly works to 1800 615 0$aCovenanters 615 0$aOaths 700 $aTimorcus$b Theophilus$01013888 702 $aGataker$b Thomas$f1574-1654, 702 $aVines$b Richard$f1600?-1656, 702 $aBaxter$b Richard$f1615-1691, 801 0$bCu-RivES 801 1$bCu-RivES 801 2$bCStRLIN 801 2$bWaOLN 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996391930903316 996 $aThe Covenanters plea against absolvers. Or, A modest discourse, shewing why those who in England & Scotland took the Solemn League and Covenant, cannot judge their consciences discharged from the obligation of it, by any thing heretofore said by the Oxford men; or lately by Dr Featly, Dr. Gauden, or any others$92359891 997 $aUNISA LEADER 01011cam0-22003611i-450 001 990007475780403321 005 20230216132601.0 010 $a8870751015 100 $a20030814d1985----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $aa-------001yy 200 1 $a<>audiovisivi in biblioteca$fMichele Vacchiano 210 $aMilano$cEditrice Bibliografica$d1985 215 $a280 p.$cill.$d21 cm 225 1 $aBibliografia e biblioteconomia$v20 610 0 $aBiblioteconomia 610 0 $aAudiovisivi 676 $a025.17 700 1$aVacchiano,$bMichele$0220969 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990007475780403321 952 $aUB-F 001$bs.i.$fILFGE 952 $a020.7 BIB. BIBL. (20)$bBIBL. 61013$fFLFBC 952 $aXIX E 4 (20)$b4757*$fFGBC 952 $aXXX COD. 118 (20)$b25073$fFSPBC 959 $aILFGE 959 $aFLFBC 959 $aFGBC 959 $aFSPBC 996 $aAudiovisivi in biblioteca$9207580 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02823nam 2200385z- 450 001 9910563072603321 005 20210210 035 $a(CKB)5680000000036097 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/38749 035 $a(oapen)doab38749 035 $a(EXLCZ)995680000000036097 100 $a20202102d2014 |y 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aMinimal Ethics for the Anthropocene 210 $cOpen Humanities Press$d2014 215 $a1 online resource (152 p.) 225 1 $aCritical Climate Change 311 08$a1-60785-328-0 330 $aLife typically becomes an object of reflection when it is seen to be under threat. In particular, humans have a tendency to engage in thinking about life (instead of just continuing to live it) when being confronted with the prospect of death: be it the death of individuals due to illness, accident or old age; the death of whole ethnic or national groups in wars and other forms of armed conflict; but also of whole populations, be they human or nonhuman. Even though Minimal Ethics for the Anthropocene is first and foremost concerned with life-understood as both a biological and social phenomenon-it is the narrative about the impending death of the human population (i.e., about the extinction of the human species), that provides a context for its argument. "Anthropocene" names a geo-historical period in which humans are said to have become the biggest threat to life on earth. However, rather than as a scientific descriptor, the term serves here primarily as an ethical injunction to think critically about human and nonhuman agency in the universe. Restrained in tone yet ambitious in scope, the book takes some steps towards outlining a minimal ethics thought on a universal scale. The task of such minimal ethics is to consider how humans can assume responsibility for various occurrences in the universe, across different scales, and how they can respond to the tangled mesh of connections and relations unfolding in it. Its goal is not so much to tell us how to live but rather to allow us to rethink "life" and what we can do with it, in whatever time we have left. The book embraces a speculative mode of thinking that is more akin to the artist's method; it also includes a photographic project by the author. 606 $aEthics & moral philosophy$2bicssc 610 $aanthropocene 610 $aEthics 610 $aEvolution 610 $aHenri Bergson 610 $aOntology 615 7$aEthics & moral philosophy 700 $aZylinska$b Joanna$4auth$0802892 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910563072603321 996 $aMinimal Ethics for the Anthropocene$91804173 997 $aUNINA