LEADER 00995nam0-22002891i-450- 001 990004555520403321 005 19990530 035 $a000455552 035 $aFED01000455552 035 $a(Aleph)000455552FED01 035 $a000455552 100 $a19990530d1980----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $aDe liberalitate urbis gevaliae oratio et carmen$fJohannes Ulvichius$gkritische ausgabe mit kommentar und Sprachlich-Rhetorisch Gelehrsamkeitlicher untersuchung von Alf Uddholm 210 $aStockholm$cAlmquist e Wiksell$d1980 215 $a94 p.$d23 cm 225 1 $aActa Universitatis Stockholmiensis. Studia Latina Stockholminsia$v27 700 1$aUlvichius,$bJohannes$0180048 702 1$aUddholm,$bAlf 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990004555520403321 952 $a7/VIII F2(27)$bbibl.53208$fFLFBC 959 $aFLFBC 996 $aDe liberalitate urbis gevaliae oratio et carmen$9547651 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02759nam 2200553Ia 450 001 9910786237503321 005 20230803025628.0 010 $a1-59332-705-6 035 $a(CKB)2670000000341078 035 $a(EBL)1128633 035 $a(OCoLC)831120728 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000856086 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11440451 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000856086 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10804896 035 $a(PQKB)11597078 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1128633 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1128633 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10677869 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000341078 100 $a20130211d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aEstimating drug use$b[electronic resource] $ethe effect of sampling methods and policy implications /$fJanine Kremling 210 $aEl Paso $cLFB Scholarly Publishing LLC$d2013 215 $a1 online resource (202 p.) 225 0 $aCriminal justice: recent scholarship 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-59332-519-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aList of tables -- List of figures -- Overview of the duf and adam program : understanding the problem -- Why is it important to study illicit drug use? -- DUF and ADAM program : criticism and transition from a the convenience to a probability sample -- Data description and analytical strategy -- Results of the equivalence analysis : assessing the impact of sampling procedures -- Discussion and conclusion -- Appendices -- References -- Index. 330 $aKremling uses data from the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) and the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) programs to explore whether the drug estimates of DUF, using a non-probability sample, and the drug use estimates of ADAM, using a probability sample, yield different results. She finds that the drug use information in DUF and ADAM is not substantially different for marijuana, cocaine, and opiates for all sites analyzed together. Her main conclusion is that a probability sample does not produce results that are substantially different from a convenience sample. While a researcher can attempt to 410 0$aCriminal Justice: Recent Scholarship 606 $aDrug abuse$zUnited States$xResearch 606 $aSubstance abuse$zUnited States$xResearch 615 0$aDrug abuse$xResearch. 615 0$aSubstance abuse$xResearch. 676 $a362.29/120973 700 $aKremling$b Janine$f1977-$01495145 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910786237503321 996 $aEstimating drug use$93719149 997 $aUNINA