LEADER 01165cam0-22003731i-450- 001 990004308300403321 005 20140901152417.0 010 $a88-14-01561-9 035 $a000430830 035 $aFED01000430830 035 $a(Aleph)000430830FED01 035 $a000430830 100 $a19990604d1988----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $aLatrocinium$egiustizia, scienza penale e repressione del banditismo in antico regime$fLuigi Lacchè 210 $aMilano$cGiuffrè$d1988 215 $a426 p.$d24 cm 225 1 $aPubblicazioni della Facoltà di giurisprudenza, Università di Macerata$i2. ser.$v55 676 $a345.09$v20$zita 700 1$aLacchè,$bLuigi$0405275 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990004308300403321 952 $aVIII B 7A (55)$bDip.Disc.st. 3366$fFLFBC$mBRAU-34940 952 $aUNIVERSITÀ 358 BIS (55)$b7489$fFGBC 952 $aSDI-KG 2017$b719 ddr$fSDI$m21-9726 952 $aVIII 7 A (55)$bDISC.FILOSO.3366$fFLFBC 959 $aFLFBC 959 $aSDI 959 $aFGBC 996 $aLatrocinium$9488657 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03148nam 2200577Ia 450 001 9910785016103321 005 20230913152846.0 010 $a1-58901-622-X 035 $a(CKB)2670000000040057 035 $a(EBL)547780 035 $a(OCoLC)654443583 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000414117 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11313103 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000414117 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10385130 035 $a(PQKB)10407054 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse3295 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL547780 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10399508 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC547780 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000040057 100 $a20090828h20102010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aCity-county consolidation $epromises made, promises kept? /$fSuzanne M. Leland and Kurt Thurmaier, editors 210 1$aWashington D.C. :$cGeorgetown University Press,$d2010. 210 4$a©2010 215 $a1 online resource (322 pages) $cillustrations, maps 225 1 $aAmerican governance and public policy series 311 0 $a1-58901-628-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aCity-County Consolidation; Chapter 1: A Research Design for Evaluating Consolidation Performance; Chapter 2: An Assessment of the City-County Consolidation of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee; Chapter 3: Does Consolidation Make a Difference?; Chapter 4: What Difference Does City-County Consolidation Make?; Chapter 5: City-County Consolidation; Chapter 6: "The Urge to Merge"; Chapter 7: From Company Town to Consolidated Government; Chapter 8: The Case of Lynchburg and Moore County, Tennessee, Consolidation; Chapter 9: Unification Promises and Outcomes; Chapter 10: Improving the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Service Delivery in Local Government; Chapter 11: Promises Made, Promises Kept; Contributors; Index 330 $aAlthough a frequently discussed reform, campaigns to merge a major municipality and county to form a unified government fail to win voter approval eighty per cent of the time. One cause for the low success rate may be that little systematic analysis of consolidated governments has been done. In Cityu?County Consolidation, Suzanne Leland and Kurt Thurmaier compare nine cityu?county consolidationsu?incorporating data from 10 years before and after each consolidationu?to similar cities and counties that did not consolidate. Their groundbreaking study offers valuable insight into whether consolidation 410 0$aAmerican governance and public policy. 606 $aMetropolitan government$zUnited States 606 $aLocal government$zUnited States 615 0$aMetropolitan government 615 0$aLocal government 676 $a320.8/590973 701 $aLeland$b Suzanne M.$f1971-$01474472 701 $aThurmaier$b Kurt M.$f1957-$01474473 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910785016103321 996 $aCity-county consolidation$93688208 997 $aUNINA