LEADER 00860cam0-2200325---450 001 990004064490403321 005 20241119100621.0 010 $a0-19-922074-3 035 $a000406449 035 $aFED01000406449 035 $a(Aleph)000406449FED01 035 $a000406449 100 $a19990604d1995----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aeng 102 $aGB 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $aGreek thought$fby Christopher Gill 210 $aOxford$cOxford University press$d1995 215 $a103 p.$d24 cm 225 1 $aGreece and Rome$v25 610 0 $aFilosofia greca 676 $a182 700 1$aGill,$bChristopher$f<1946- >$0156364 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990004064490403321 952 $a180 GILC 001$bBibl.23968$fFLFBC 959 $aFLFBC 996 $aGreek thought$9304953 997 $aUNINA LEADER 05912oam 2200793I 450 001 9910974756103321 005 20190826145055.0 010 $a9789004230477 010 $a9004230475 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004230477 035 $a(CKB)3190000000032920 035 $a(EBL)1112832 035 $a(OCoLC)826856227 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000704241 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12331372 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000704241 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10704546 035 $a(PQKB)11483139 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1112832 035 $a(OCoLC)810338093 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004230477 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1112832 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10648749 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL427095 035 $a(PPN)174543689 035 $a(EXLCZ)993190000000032920 100 $a20120920d2012 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aCopies versus cognates in bound morphology /$fedited by Lars Johanson, Martine Robbeets 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aLeiden ;$aBoston :$cBrill,$d2012. 215 $a1 online resource (471 p.) 225 0 $aBrill's studies in language, cognition, and culture,$x1897-5412 ;$vv. 2 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a9789004224070 311 08$a9004224076 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $tPreliminary Material -- $t1. Bound morphology in common: copy or cognate? /$rLars Johanson and Martine Robbeets -- $t2. Non-borrowed non-cognate parallels in bound morphology: Aspects of the phenomenon of shared drift with Eurasian examples /$rJuha Janhunen -- $t3. Selection for m : T pronominals in Eurasia /$rJohanna Nichols -- $t4. Plural across inflection and derivation, fusion and agglutination /$rFrancesco Gardani -- $t5. Bound morphology in English (and beyond): copy or cognate? /$rAnthony Grant -- $t6. Copiability of (bound) morphology /$rAd Backus and Anna Verschik -- $t7. A variationist solution to apparent copying across related languages /$rBrian D. Joseph -- $t8. ?Invisible? loans: How to borrow a bound form /$rAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald -- $t9. Constraints on morphological borrowing: Evidence from Latin America /$rDik Bakker and Ewald Hekking -- $t10. Morphological borrowing in Sierra Popoluca /$rSalomé Gutiérrez-Morales -- $t11. Cognates versus copies in North America: New light on the old discussion on diffusion versus inheritance /$rPeter Bakker -- $t12. On the degree of copiability of derivational and inflectional morphology: Evidence from Basque /$rStig Eliasson -- $t13. Between copy and cognate: the origin of absolutes in Old and Middle English /$rNikki van de Pol -- $t14. Copying and cognates in the Balkan Sprachbund /$rVictor A. Friedman -- $t15. Transfer of morphemes and grammatical structure in Ancient Anatolia /$rFolke Josephson -- $t16. The historical background of the transfer of a Kurdish bound morpheme to Neo-Aramaic /$rJudith Josephson -- $t17. On the sustainability of inflectional morphology /$rÉva Á. Csató -- $t18. Foreign and indigenous properties in the vocabulary of Eynu, a secret language spoken in the south of Taklamakan /$rTooru Hayasi -- $t19. Deriving insights about Tungusic classification from derivational morphology /$rLindsay Whaley -- $t20. The likelihood of morphological borrowing: The case of Korean and Japanese /$rJ. Marshall Unger -- $t21. Shared verb morphology in the Transeurasian languages: copy or cognate? /$rMartine Robbeets -- $tLanguage Index -- $tSubject Index. 330 $aGenealogical linguistics and areal linguistics are rarely treated from an integrated perspective even if they are twin faces of diachronic linguistics. In Copies versus Cognates in Bound Morphology Lars Johanson and Martine Robbeets take up this challenge. The result is a wealth of empirical facts and different theoretical approaches, advanced by internationally renowned specialists and young scholars whose research is highly pertinent to the topic. Copies versus Cognates in Bound Morphology puts genealogical and areal explanation for shared morphology in a balanced perspective and works out criteria to distinguish between morphological cognates and copies. Lars Johanson and Martine Robbeets provide nothing less than the foundations for a new perspective on diachronic linguistics between genealogical and areal linguistics. Contributors include: Alexandra Aikhenvald, Ad Backus, Dik Bakker, Peter Bakker, Éva Csató, Stig Eliasson, Victor Friedman, Francesco Gardani, Anthony Grant, Salomé Gutiérrez-Morales, Tooru Hayasi, Ewald Hekking, Juha Janhunen, Lars Johanson, Brian Joseph, Folke Josephson, Judith Josephson, Johanna Nichols, Martine Robbeets, Marshall Unger, Nikki van de Pol, Anna Verschik, Lindsay Whaley 410 0$aBrill's Studies in Language, Cognition and Culture$v2. 606 $aComparative linguistics 606 $aCognate words 606 $aAreal linguistics 606 $aLinguistic universals 606 $aLanguages in contact 606 $aLanguage spread 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSuffixes and prefixes 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xMorphology 615 0$aComparative linguistics. 615 0$aCognate words. 615 0$aAreal linguistics. 615 0$aLinguistic universals. 615 0$aLanguages in contact. 615 0$aLanguage spread. 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSuffixes and prefixes. 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xMorphology. 676 $a410 701 $aJohanson$b Lars$f1936-$0174606 701 $aRobbeets$b Martine Irma$0692622 801 0$bNL-LeKB 801 1$bNL-LeKB 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910974756103321 996 $aCopies versus cognates in bound morphology$94320666 997 $aUNINA