LEADER 00828nam0-22002891i-450- 001 990002064440403321 005 20150624140133.0 035 $a000206444 035 $aFED01000206444 035 $a(Aleph)000206444FED01 035 $a000206444 100 $a20030910d1999----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aeng 200 1 $aProceedings of the 5th international sponge symposium 210 $aBrisbane$cQueensland Museum$d1999 215 $a707 p.$d24 cm 225 1 $aMemoirs of the Queensland Museum$v44 610 0 $aSpugne 610 0 $aPorifera 676 $a639.734 710 12$aInternational sponge symposium$d<5.;$f1998;$eBrisbane> 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990002064440403321 952 $a61 VII B.2/ATT.C.155$b7947 (14/04/2000)$fDAGEN 959 $aDAGEN 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02437nam 2200457 450 001 9910511426503321 005 20190826145055.0 010 $a90-04-36823-X 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004368231 035 $a(CKB)4100000004036811 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5449624 035 $a(OCoLC)1043913896 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004368231 035 $a(PPN)243732473 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000004036811 100 $a20180712d2018 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe Antonine Constitution $ean edict for the Caracallan Empire /$fby Alex Imrie 210 1$aLeiden ;$aBoston :$cBrill,$d[2018] 215 $a1 online resource (xiv, 175 pages) 225 1 $aImpact of empire : Roman Empire, c. 200 B.C.-A.D. 476 ;$vv. 29 311 $a90-04-36822-1 327 $aFront Matter -- Copyright page -- Dedication -- Preface -- List of Abbreviations -- List of Figures, Table and Illustration -- Introduction -- Contexts -- The Fiscal Rationale -- The Military Rationale -- Alexander Imitatio -- Securing the Caracallan Empire -- Epilogue -- Back Matter -- Appendix -- Bibliography. 330 $aIn The Antonine Constitution , Alex Imrie approaches the famous edict of AD 212 from numerous angles, offering an assessment of its rationale that is rooted in the dynamic period of the early third century. Controversial since its discovery, it is depicted here as a keystone in Caracalla?s attempt to revolutionise the public image of the Severan dynasty after murdering his brother. There is an inherent paradox between the apparently progressive nature of the edict, and the volatile emperor responsible for it. The enigma is only heightened by a dearth of ancient evidence relating to the legislation. By combining literary and material evidence with the surviving papyrological record, Alex Imrie shows that Caracalla?s rationale is best understood in an embedded context. 410 0$aImpact of Empire$v29. 606 $aCitizenship$zRome 607 $aRome$xPolitics and government$y30 B.C.-284 A.D 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aCitizenship 676 $a937.07 700 $aImrie$b Alex$01067924 801 0$bNL-LeKB 801 1$bNL-LeKB 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910511426503321 996 $aThe Antonine Constitution$92552210 997 $aUNINA