LEADER 01083nam0-22003491i-450 001 990001784550403321 005 20200724112039.0 035 $a000178455 035 $aFED01000178455 035 $a(Aleph)000178455FED01 035 $a000178455 100 $a20030910d1993----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $aAspetti innovativi nel progresso delle scienze biologiche$eatti della 62. riunione$eViterbo, 29/9-2/10 1993$fSocietā italiana per il progresso delle scienze 210 $aRoma$cSIPS$d1993 215 $a397 p.$d24 cm 610 0 $aScienze pure 610 0 $aBiologia 676 $a500 676 $a570$v23$zita 710 02$aSocietā italiana per il progresso delle scienze$03857 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990001784550403321 952 $a60 570 SIPS 1993$b4705$fFAGBC 952 $a61 VII A.5/73$b4834 (26/09/94)$fDAGEN 959 $aFAGBC 959 $aDAGEN 996 $aAspetti innovativi nel progresso delle scienze biologiche$9408117 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03132nam 22006014a 450 001 9910777381203321 005 20230422042914.0 010 $a1-4408-2658-7 010 $a1-282-40522-5 010 $a9786612405228 010 $a0-313-01926-6 035 $a(CKB)1000000000000694 035 $a(EBL)492321 035 $a(OCoLC)55002856 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000277002 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11237847 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000277002 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10232994 035 $a(PQKB)10127605 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL492321 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10018026 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL240522 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC492321 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000000694 100 $a19990212d2000 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aArmy relations with Congress$b[electronic resource] $ethick armor, dull sword, slow horse /$fStephen K. Scroggs 210 $aWestport, Conn. $cPrager$d2000 215 $a1 online resource (288 p.) 225 1 $aNon-Series 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-275-96176-1 311 $a0-275-96175-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [253]-254) and index. 327 $aContents; Preface; Acknowledgments; 1. Introduction: Liaising versus Lobbying; 2. Roles of Legislative Liaison and Military Service Liaisers; 3. Patterns of Army-Congressional Relations; 4. Army Cultural Dimensions: An Inward-Looking Team Player; 5. M1A1 Tank Transfer: Culture Impedes Army Effectiveness on the Hill; 6. Findings and Recommendations; Epilogue; Appendix A: Research Interviews (as of 1995); Appendix B: Washington Experience Leadership Sample Comparisons for U.S. Military Services in 1995: Data Used in Compilation of Figures Used for Tables 4-1-4.4 327 $aAppendix C: Army Washington Experience Leadership Sample Run, 1980-81 Era: Data Used in Compilation of Figures Used for Table 4-5For Further Reading; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; R; S; T; U; V; W; Z 330 $a Relying on extensive candid interviews from members of Congress and staff on defense authorization committees and senior Army general officers, Scroggs provides a strong insider analysis with recommendations. He examines the impact of culture on the varying abilities of public agencies, specifically the Army, to pursue its organizational interests through lobbying or liaising Congress. Scroggs argues that despite structural similarities in how the four military services approach Congress, differences in service culture affect their relative success in achieving their goals on the Hill. Sc 410 0$aNon-Series 606 $aCivil-military relations$zUnited States 615 0$aCivil-military relations 676 $a322/.5/0973 700 $aScroggs$b Stephen K.$f1954-$01540339 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910777381203321 996 $aArmy relations with Congress$93791922 997 $aUNINA