LEADER 00943nam0-22002771i-450- 001 990001632260403321 005 20050318092857.0 035 $a000163226 035 $aFED01000163226 035 $a(Aleph)000163226FED01 035 $a000163226 100 $a20030910d1955----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aeng 200 1 $a<>century of progress in the natural sciences 1853-1953$epublished in celebration of the Centennial of the California Academy of Sciences$fCalifornia Academy of Sciences 210 $aSan Francisco$cCalifornia Academy of Sciences$d1955 215 $a807 p.$d26 cm 610 0 $aScienze naturali$aStoria 676 $a500 710 02$aCalifornia Academy of sciences$069869 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990001632260403321 952 $a60 574.9 B 7$b35751$fFAGBC 959 $aFAGBC 996 $aCentury of progress in the natural sciences 1853-1953$9367235 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01145nam 2200313Ia 450 001 996386194003316 005 20221103135436.0 035 $a(CKB)4940000000082605 035 $a(EEBO)2264221653 035 $a(OCoLC)17154123 035 $a(EXLCZ)994940000000082605 100 $a19871201d1669 uy | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||a|bb| 200 14$aThe churches peace asserted upon a civil account$b[electronic resource] $eas it was (great part of it) deliver'd in a sermon before the Right Honourable the Lord Mayor in Guild-Hall-Chappel July 4 /$fby Ad. Littleton, presbyter 210 $aLondon $cPrinted for Philip Chetwind$dMDCLXIX [1669] 215 $a[11], 38 p 300 $aErrata: p. 38. 300 $aReproduction of original in the Union Theological Seminary Library, New York. 330 $aeebo-0160 606 $aSermons, English$y17th century 615 0$aSermons, English 700 $aLittleton$b Adam$f1627-1694.$0547440 801 1$bEAK 801 2$bWaOLN 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996386194003316 996 $aThe churches peace asserted upon a civil account$92394900 997 $aUNISA LEADER 04927nam 2200721 450 001 9910807388903321 005 20230814223056.0 010 $a3-11-057403-9 010 $a3-11-057639-2 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110576399 035 $a(CKB)4100000005043738 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5505559 035 $a(DE-B1597)489282 035 $a(OCoLC)1046610051 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110576399 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5505559 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11605909 035 $a(OCoLC)1037884040 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000005043738 100 $a20180924d2018 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aWhy China did not have a renaissance - and why that matters $ean interdisciplinary dialogue /$fThomas Maissen and Barbara Mittler 205 $aFirst edition. 210 1$aBerlin ;$aBoston :$cWalter de Gruyter,$d[2018] 210 4$dİ2018 215 $a1 online resource (258 pages) 225 0 $aCritical readings in global intellectual history,$x2568-843X ;$vVolume 1 311 $a3-11-057396-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tList of illustrations -- $tSeries editors' note / $rBanerjee, Milinda / Meurer, Sebastian / Richter, Susan -- $tPrologue -- $tPeriodization in a global context / $rMaissen, Thomas / Mittler, Barbara -- $tIntroduction -- $tEpochal changes in a global context - Toward a History-in-common / $rMittler, Barbara -- $tDefining epochs in global history - Can we write a History-in-common without shared concepts? / $rMaissen, Thomas -- $tPart I. Periodization -- $tEurope: Secularizing teleological models / $rMaissen, Thomas -- $tChina: Engendering teleological models / $rMittler, Barbara -- $tPart II .Renaissances -- $tThe view from Europe: The Renaissance / $rMaissen, Thomas -- $tThe view from China: r/Renaissances / $rMittler, Barbara -- $tConclusion -- $tThe Renaissance and the rise of the West / $rMaissen, Thomas -- $tRenaissance-in-common? History-as-dialogue / $rMittler, Barbara -- $tEpilogue -- $tWhy China did not have a Renaissance - and why that matters: Conflicting approaches to periodization / $rMaissen, Thomas / Mittler, Barbara -- $tAppendix -- $tSources from the European Renaissance -- $tSources from the Chinese Renaissance -- $tAcknowledgements -- $tWorks cited -- $tIndex of names and places 330 $aConcepts of historical progress or decline and the idea of a cycle of historical movement have existed in many civilizations. In spite of claims that they be transnational or even universal, periodization schemes invariably reveal specific social and cultural predispositions.Our dialogue, which brings together a Sinologist and a scholar of early modern History in Europe, considers periodization as a historical phenomenon, studying the case of the "Renaissance." Understood in the tradition of J. Burckhardt, who referred back to ideas voiced by the humanists of the 14th and 15th centuries, and focusing on the particularities of humanist dialogue which informed the making of the "Renaissance" in Italy, our discussion highlights elements that distinguish it from other movements that have proclaimed themselves as "r/Renaissances," studying, in particular, the Chinese Renaissance in the early 20th century.While disagreeing on several fundamental issues, we suggest that interdisciplinary and interregional dialogue is a format useful to addressing some of the more far-reaching questions in global history, e.g. whether and when a periodization scheme such as "Renaissance" can fruitfully be applied to describe non-European experiences. 606 $aRenaissance 606 $aHISTORY / Renaissance$2bisacsh 606 $aHISTORY / Asia / General$2bisacsh 606 $aHISTORY / Asia / China$2bisacsh 606 $aHISTORY / Europe / General$2bisacsh 606 $aHISTORY / Europe / Western$2bisacsh 606 $aHISTORY / Study & Teaching$2bisacsh 606 $aHISTORY / Modern / General$2bisacsh 607 $aChina$xHistory$yMing dynasty, 1368-1644 615 0$aRenaissance. 615 7$aHISTORY / Renaissance. 615 7$aHISTORY / Asia / General. 615 7$aHISTORY / Asia / China. 615 7$aHISTORY / Europe / General. 615 7$aHISTORY / Europe / Western. 615 7$aHISTORY / Study & Teaching. 615 7$aHISTORY / Modern / General. 676 $a909/.4 686 $aHIS037020$aHIS003000$aHIS008000$aHIS010000$aHIS010020$aHIS035000$aHIS037030$2bisacsh 700 $aMaissen$b Thomas$f1962-$0945139 702 $aMittler$b Barbara$f1968- 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910807388903321 996 $aWhy China did not have a renaissance - and why that matters$93973656 997 $aUNINA