LEADER 00647nam0-22002411i-450- 001 990001145590403321 005 20121106165509.0 035 $a000114559 035 $aFED01000114559 035 $a(Aleph)000114559FED01 035 $a000114559 100 $a20001205d1902----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 200 1 $aCarlo Riva Ricordi$fdi De Lorenzo 210 $as.l.$cTi.Acc. R. Sci$d1902 700 1$aDe Lorenzo,$bGiuseppe$f<1871-1957>$02256 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990001145590403321 952 $a117-A-15$b03178$fMA1 959 $aMA1 996 $aCarlo Riva Ricordi$9344647 997 $aUNINA LEADER 00914nam a2200265 i 4500 001 991001960469707536 005 20020507154511.0 008 990729s1994 uk ||| | eng 020 $a0333593332 035 $ab11589115-39ule_inst 035 $aLE02728112$9ExL 040 $aDip.to Studi Giuridici$bita 082 0 $a324.2410409 100 1 $aGamble, Andrew$0119457 245 14$aThe free economy and the strong state :$bthe politics of Thatcherism /$cAndrew Gamble 250 $a2. ed 260 $aBasingstoke :$bMacmillan,$c1994 300 $axii, 282 p. 650 4$aPolitica$xStoria 907 $a.b11589115$b21-09-06$c02-07-02 912 $a991001960469707536 945 $aLE027 C-IV/C 1$g1$iLE027-51$lle027$o-$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i11798440$z02-07-02 996 $aFree economy and the strong state$9896336 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale027$b01-01-99$cm$da $e-$feng$guk $h4$i1 LEADER 02551nam 22004573a 450 001 9910280872303321 005 20250204000824.0 010 $a9788538603290 035 $a(CKB)4100000005183340 035 $a(OAPEN)1000301 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/34283 035 $a(ScCtBLL)9856b94a-c9ac-4ae7-8b70-3e8c513d497b 035 $a(OCoLC)1051778021 035 $a(oapen)doab34283 035 $a(NjHacI)994100000005183340 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000005183340 100 $a20250204i20162020 uu 101 0 $apor 135 $auuuuu---auuuu 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aCiência, medicina e perícia nas tecnologias de governo 210 $cUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul$d2016 210 1$a[s.l.] :$cUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul,$d2016. 215 $a1 online resource (175) 311 08$a9788538603290 311 08$a8538603299 330 $aAnthropology has been playing a central role in questioning the supposed objective and apolitical character of scientific knowledge by underlining the socio-cultural context and history of the constitution of any scientific theory. From different research universes, anthropologists have sought to demonstrate how science and politics are composed, juxtaposed and produced in the daily work of social actors. In the wake of what Donna Haraway (1995) pointed out, it is there would not be the "science" look, but the look of the scientists - always located in a space (which is not only geographical, but temporal, cultural, marked by social differences, etc.). It is therefore based on the premise that science and are mutually constituted and from specific contexts. Following In this line, this collection explores how certain knowledges are constituted and legitimized, how technologies of government come into action - and, through practices of the social agents, are (re) formulated - and how through such devices new categories of analysis, social markers, populations and subjectivities (FONSECA, MACHADO, 2015) 606 $aAnthropology$xData processing 606 $aAnthropology$xHistory 615 0$aAnthropology$xData processing. 615 0$aAnthropology$xHistory. 676 $a301.0285 700 $aBesen$b Lucas Riboli$01850591 801 0$bScCtBLL 801 1$bScCtBLL 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910280872303321 996 $aCiência, medicina e perícia nas tecnologias de governo$94443734 997 $aUNINA