01911nam0-22003731i-450-99001010143040332120160928151742.0m.i- o.ex des. eSdE (3) 1556 (R)feiIT-NAStoriadelDiritto001010143FED01001010143(Aleph)001010143FED0100101014320160914d1556----km-y0itay50------balata-------------------bb0-----Digestum nouum. Pandectarum iuris ciuilis tomus tertius sextae partis reliquum, ac septimam, eandemque nouissimam Digestorum partem continens, ex Pandectis Florentinis ita in vniuersum recognitus, ac emendatus: ... Adiecimus pluribus locis annotationes ex varijs, ijsdemque classicis authoribus, ... Inscriptiones præterea singulorum capitum indicantes, ...Lugduniapud Hugonem à Porta1556Lugduniexcudebat Bartholomæus Frænus[56], 866 p.ill.fol.Sul front. marca dei de La Porte: Centurione con due battenti di legno, recanti le scritte "libertatem meam" e "mecum porto", attraversa una porta monumentale sormontata dall'effigie di GianoIniziali e fregi xil.Front. e testo stampati in carattere rosso e neroSegn.: 2a-2b⁸ 2c-2d⁶ a-z⁸ A-2G⁸ 2H¹⁰(-2H10)Precede il testo: Nouissima & admodum frugifera exceptionum arbor, aedita per disertum virum Petrum Rebuffi de Monte Pessullano ... ab authore iam recens recognita, & emendataRestauro della legatura in pelleIT-NAStoriadelDiritto: XI B 32001Exceptionum arborCorpus iuris civilis. Digestum novum.Francia.LioneRebuffi,Pierre<1487-1557>ITUNINARICAUNIMARCAQ990010101430403321XI B 31151SDISDIUNINA00889cam2 22002531 450 SOBE0005387620161114105612.020161114d1975 |||||ita|0103 baitaIT<<1: >>Quaderni 1-5Antonio GramsciTorinoEinaudi1975LXVIII, 682 p.18 cm.001E6002000055862001 Quaderni del carcere / Antonio Gramsci ; edizione critica dell'Istituto Gramsci ; a cura di Valentino GerratanaGramsci, AntonioAF00013184070118233ITUNISOB20161114RICAUNISOBUNISOB320119421SOBE00053876M 102 Monografia moderna SBNM320002195-1SI119421NegrorovitoUNISOBUNISOB20161114104353.020161114104438.0rovitoQuaderni 1-51552891UNISOB04379nam 22006731 450 991045141830332120021204165756.01-4725-6219-41-280-80056-997866108005681-84731-150-410.5040/9781472562197(CKB)1000000000338585(EBL)270667(OCoLC)476004584(SSID)ssj0000258239(PQKBManifestationID)12078702(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000258239(PQKBWorkID)10254132(PQKB)11314204(MiAaPQ)EBC1750715(MiAaPQ)EBC270667(Au-PeEL)EBL1750715(CaPaEBR)ebr10276361(CaONFJC)MIL80056(OCoLC)893331536(OCoLC)181844913(UtOrBLW)bpp09256500(Au-PeEL)EBL270667(EXLCZ)99100000000033858520140929d2000 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrA theory of precedent from analytical positivism to a post-analytical philosophy of law /by Raimo Siltala1st ed.Oxford [England] ;Portland, Oregon :Hart Publishing,2000.1 online resource (304 p.)Description based upon print version of record.1-84113-123-7 Includes bibliographical references (pages [269]-278) and index.Part A: How to Do Things with Precedents. 1 Frame of Analysis ; 2 The Concept of a Legal Norm: Legal Rules and Principles ; 3 A Theory of Precedent Ideology ; 4 Confrontations ; 5 Theory and Practice of Precedent-Following -- Part B: A Theory of the Multi-Level Structure of Law. 6 Towards a Rule of Law Ideology for Precedents ; 7 Discourse-Theoretical Frame of Law: Ratio and Auctoritas, and the Felicity Conditions of Legal Adjudication ; 8 The Quest for the Final Premises of Law - I: The Infrastructures of Legal Norm Constitution ; 9 The Quest for the Final Premises of Law - II: The Infrastructures of Judicial Signification under Precedent-Following ; 10 Summary."Analytical jurisprudence has been mostly silent on the role of precedent in legal adjudication. What is the content of a judge's precedent ideology,or the rule of precedent-recognition, by means of which the ratio of a case is to be distinguished from mere dicta? In this study, the author identifies six types of judicial precedent-ideology, among them judicial legislation, systemic construction of the underlying reasons of law in the Dworkinian sense, and a radical re-evaluation of the merits of a prior case in later adjudication, as envisioned by the American Realists. These competing models are tested against judicial experiences in the UK, US, France, Italy, Germany and Finland. By this means Lon Fuller's famous 'internal morality of law' is shown to function rather poorly in the context of precedents, and the author therefore suggests a redefinition of the rule which makes it work for precedent. This, in turn leads the author to confront fundamental questions about the normative nature of law. Is Kelsen's grundnorm or Hart's ultimate rule of recognition a valid rule, in the image of legal rules proper, or is it merely a social fact, observable only in the practices and behaviour of judges and other officials? The author claims that Hart is caught between Kelsen and J.L. Borges, the late Argentinian fabulist, in so far as the ontology and epistemology of the rule of recognition are concerned. This leads the author to the conclusion that the two predicaments affecting analytical positivism, namely the threat of endless self-referentiality, or infinite regress, can only be accounted for by means of recourse to the philosophy of deconstruction as posited by Jacques Derrida."--Bloomsbury Publishing.LawPhilosophyStare decisisJurisprudence & philosophy of lawElectronic books.LawPhilosophy.Stare decisis.340/.1Siltala Raimo1037180UtOrBLWUtOrBLWBOOK9910451418303321A theory of precedent2457960UNINA