00817cam0 2200265 450 E60020001904720210426075316.020060616d1976 |||||ita|0103 baitaITNon direttivitàCesare ScuratiBresciaLa Scuola1976142 p.21 cmPedagogia80001LAEC000216352001 *Pedagogia80SCURATI, CesareAF00022295070143298ITUNISOB20210426RICAUNISOBUNISOB37028278E600200019047M 102 Monografia moderna SBNM370000570Si28278acquistopregresso1UNISOBUNISOB20060616111446.020190513094034.0SpinosaNon direttività868074UNISOB06090nam 22007692 450 991080975870332120151005020621.01-107-24158-81-139-89127-81-316-60477-21-139-24886-31-107-24862-01-107-25111-71-107-24779-91-107-25028-51-107-24945-7(CKB)2550000001095257(EBL)1357353(OCoLC)846495341(SSID)ssj0000887846(PQKBManifestationID)11525271(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000887846(PQKBWorkID)10841686(PQKB)10210713(UkCbUP)CR9781139248860(Au-PeEL)EBL1357353(CaPaEBR)ebr10718511(CaONFJC)MIL502004(MiAaPQ)EBC1357353(EXLCZ)99255000000109525720120220d2013|||| uy| 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierMorphological typology from word to paradigm /Gregory Stump and Raphael A. Finkel, University of Kentucky[electronic resource]Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,2013.1 online resource (xxiv, 402 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Cambridge studies in linguistics ;138Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).1-107-02924-4 1-299-70753-X Includes bibliographical references and index.Cover; Contents; Tables; Figures; Abbreviations; Introduction; 1 Principal parts; 1.1 The traditional notion of principal parts; 1.2 Principal parts in linguistic theory and in language typology; 1.2.1 Principal parts and the lexicon; 1.2.2 Principal parts in language typology; 1.3. Some preliminary assumptions; 1.3.1 If two lexemes belong to the same syntactic category but to contrasting ICs, their principal-part sets may be different.; 1.3.2 An inflectional system's principal parts may be chosen according to one of three schemes; The static scheme for optimal principal-part setsThe adaptive scheme for optimal principal-part setsThe dynamic scheme for optimal principal-part sets; 1.3.3 There may be more than one optimal principal-part analysis for the lexemes in a given inflectional system; 2 Plats; 2.1 Plats and their parts; 2.1.1 Redundant MPSs; 2.1.2 Kinds of exponences; 2.1.3 Grammatical information; 2.1.4 Omitted lexemes; 2.2 The representation issue; 3 A typology of principal-part systems; 3.1 A typology of principal-part systems; 3.2 Criterion A: How many principal parts are needed to determine a lexeme's IC membership?3.3 Criterion B: How many dynamic principal parts are needed to determine a given cell in a lexeme's realized paradigm?3.4 Criterion C: To what extent are particular realized cells favored as optimal static principal parts?; 3.5 Summary; 4 Inflection-class transparency; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Conjugation classes in Fur; 4.3 Deviations from maximal transparency in Fur verb paradigms; 4.4 A first measure of IC transparency: IC predictability; 4.5 A fourth criterion of IC transparency; 4.6 A second measure of IC transparency: cell predictability; 4.7 IC transparency and the No-Blur Principle4.8 IC transparency as a dimension of typological variation4.9 IC predictability, cell predictability, and entropy as measures of an inflection-class system's complexity; 4.10 Conclusions; 4.11 Appendix; 5 Grammatically enhanced plats; 5.1 Sanskrit declension; 5.2 Measuring the IC complexity of the hearer-oriented declensional plat; 5.2.1 The Sanskrit plat's optimal principal-part numbers; 5.2.2 The Sanskrit plat's cell predictor numbers; 5.2.3 Alternative analyses for ICs in the Sanskrit plat; 5.2.4 IC predictability and cell predictability in the Sanskrit plat; 5.2.5 Cell predictiveness5.3 Grammatical disambiguation of distinguishers in the Sanskrit declensional plat5.3.1 Disambiguation by means of gender information; 5.3.2 Disambiguation by means of stem demarcation; 5.4 The effects of enhancing principal parts with gender specifications and/or stem demarcations; 5.4.1 Optimal principal-part numbers; 5.4.2 Cell predictor numbers; 5.4.3 Alternative analyses; 5.4.4 IC predictability and cell predictability; 5.4.5 Cell predictiveness; 5.5 Conclusions; 6 Impostors and heteroclites; 6.1 Impostors and plat construction; 6.2 Heteroclites and plat construction7 Stems as principal partsIn this radically new approach to morphological typology, the authors set out new and explicit methods for the typological classification of languages. Drawing on evidence from a diverse range of languages including Chinantec, Dakota, French, Fur, Icelandic, Ngiti and Sanskrit, the authors propose innovative ways of measuring inflectional complexity. Designed to engage graduate students and academic researchers, the book presents opportunities for further investigation. The authors' data sets and the computational tool that they constructed for their analysis are available online, allowing readers to employ them in their own research. Readers can access the online computational tool through www.cambridge.org/stump_finkel.Cambridge studies in linguistics ;138.Grammar, Comparative and generalMorphologyGrammar, Comparative and generalMorphosyntaxTypology (Linguistics)Grammar, Comparative and generalMorphology.Grammar, Comparative and generalMorphosyntax.Typology (Linguistics)415/.9Stump Gregory T(Gregory Thomas),1954-174582Finkel Raphael A.UkCbUPUkCbUPBOOK9910809758703321Morphological typology3948072UNINA00890nam0 22002653i 450 NAP097217620250627063237.020240110d1983 ||||0itac50 baitaitz01i xxxe z01nProbabilities et potentielClaude Dellacherie, Paul-Andrè MeyerParigiHermann1983228 p24 cmProbabilitàFIRNAPC029009I519.2PROBABILITA23Dellacherie, ClaudeMILV00863807054847ITIT-NA007920240110IT-BN0095 NAP0972176Biblioteca Centralizzata di Ateneo 01M/S (AR) 12 625 01AR 0700126255 B A4 1 v.D 2024011020240110 01Probabilities et potentiel3659714UNISANNIO