02480nam 2200601 a 450 99644155070331620200520144314.01-299-15799-81-118-35834-11-118-35837-61-118-35831-71-118-35833-3(CKB)3400000000085557(EBL)1120246(OCoLC)827207946(SSID)ssj0000715362(PQKBManifestationID)11433894(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000715362(PQKBWorkID)10700913(PQKB)10670605(MiAaPQ)EBC1120246(Au-PeEL)EBL1120246(CaPaEBR)ebr10657916(CaONFJC)MIL447049(PPN)244379122(EXLCZ)99340000000008555720120326d2012 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrGreek drama and the invention of rhetoric[electronic resource] /David SansoneChichester, West Sussex ;Malden, Mass. Wiley-Blackwell20121 online resource (272 p.)Description based upon print version of record.1-118-35708-6 Includes bibliographical references and index.Pt. 1. What drama does and how it does it -- Setting the stage -- Seeing is believing -- The muse takes a holiday -- "It's counterpoint," he countered, and pointed -- Illusion and collusion -- Reaction time -- Pt. 2. The second stage: the invention of rhetoric -- Paradigm shift happens -- Perhaps you will object -- Putting the accuser on trial.Asserts a novel and controversial theory on the origins of rhetoric that differs radically from the standard viewArgues that it was the theatre of Ancient Greece, first appearing around 500 BC, that promptedthe development of formalized rhetoric, which evolved soon thereafterProvides a cogent reworking of existing evidenceReveals the bias and inconsistency of AristotleRhetoricHistoryGreek dramaHistory and criticismRhetoricHistory.Greek dramaHistory and criticism.808.009Sansone David187329MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK996441550703316Greek drama and the invention of rhetoric1757455UNISA04978oam 22009974 450 991078833130332120230721045659.01-4623-0632-21-4527-9042-697866128436001-282-84360-51-4518-7293-3(CKB)3170000000055302(EBL)1608363(SSID)ssj0000941835(PQKBManifestationID)11505436(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000941835(PQKBWorkID)10964470(PQKB)11687995(OCoLC)642055052(MiAaPQ)EBC1608363(IMF)WPIEE2009146(EXLCZ)99317000000005530220020129d2009 uf 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrIntroducing the Euro as Legal Tender—Benefits and Costs of Eurorization for Cape Verde /Patrick ImamWashington, D.C. :International Monetary Fund,2009.1 online resource (36 p.)IMF Working PapersDescription based upon print version of record.1-4519-1722-8 Includes bibliographical references.Contents; I. Introduction; II. Characteristics of Eurorization/Dollarization Countries; Tables; 1. List of Dollarized Economies; III. Potential Benefits and Costs of Eurorization for Cape Verde; Boxes; 1. Loss of Seignorage Revenue: Theory and Evidence; 2. Present Value Loss of Seignorage Revenue (as a share of GDP); Figures; 1. Debt With and Without Access to Seignorage Revenue, 2008-28; 3. Seignorage Gains for CEECs; 2. Growth Effect of Euroriztion is Temporary, not Permanent; IV. Econometric Analysis of the Characteristics of Dollarized Economies; A. Determinants of Exchange Rate Choice4. Comparing Merits of Different Fixed Exchange Rate Regimes with Cape Verde Current PegB. Data; C. Estimation; 5. Choice of Exchange Rate Regime (Dollarized Economies); 6. Choice of Exchange Rate Regime (Hard Pegs); 7. Choice of Exchange Rate Regime (Dollarized, Other Hard Pegs and Non-Hard Pegs); V. Practical Aspects of Successful Eurorization; 2. Some Practical Aspects of Introducing the Euro; VI. Conclusion; References; Appendix; 1. History of Cape Verdean Exchange Rate ArrangementsIn recent years, recommendations for countries to unilaterally dollarize/eurorize have become common, particularly when the countries lack economic credibility. After exploring the characteristics of dollarizing/eurorizing economies, we look at the merits and costs of unilateral eurorization for Cape Verde, a highly tourism based economy that has become increasingly integrated into the euro-zone area and that has a strong macroeconomic track record. We illustrate that neither the benefits nor the costs of unilateral eurorization are large and conclude that there is no compelling case to change the current exchange rate arrangement at this point in time. Econometrically, we assess the characteristics of dollarized economies and demonstrate that few of them apply to Cape Verde, further confirming that Cape Verde does not fit the pattern of most dollarizing countries.IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;No. 2009/146Euro-dollar marketForeign exchange ratesCabo VerdeForeign ExchangeimfMoney and Monetary PolicyimfMonetary SystemsimfStandardsimfRegimesimfGovernment and the Monetary SystemimfPayment SystemsimfCurrencyimfForeign exchangeimfMonetary economicsimfCurrenciesimfConventional pegimfExchange rate arrangementsimfExchange ratesimfDollarizationimfMoneyimfMonetary policyimfCabo VerdeimfEuro-dollar market.Foreign exchange ratesForeign ExchangeMoney and Monetary PolicyMonetary SystemsStandardsRegimesGovernment and the Monetary SystemPayment SystemsCurrencyForeign exchangeMonetary economicsCurrenciesConventional pegExchange rate arrangementsExchange ratesDollarizationMoneyMonetary policyImam Patrick1472655International Monetary Fund.DcWaIMFBOOK9910788331303321Introducing the Euro as Legal Tender—Benefits and Costs of Eurorization for Cape Verde3685518UNINA00622nam a2200205 i 450099100437943560753620250507153837.0250507s2003 it er 001 0 ita d8804514124Bibl. Dip.le Aggr. Studi Umanistici - Sez. FilosofiaitaSocioculturale Scsita858.00823.Abbiamo cinquantanni :atto primoMilano :Mondadori,2003351 p. :ill. ;21 cmTitolo della copertinaNuovi argomenti991004379435607536Abbiamo cinquantanni4373750UNISALENTO