00642nam a2200205 i 450099100437643200753620250415105246.0250415s1964 fr er 001 0 fre dBibl. Dip.le Aggr. Studi Umanistici - Sez. FilosofiaitaSocioculturale Scsfre10123Hersch, Jeanne162236L'illusion philosophique /Jeanne Hersch ; préface de Karl JaspersParis :Plon,1964228 p. ;19 cmFilosofiaTeorieJaspers, Karl991004376432007536Illusion philosophique50365UNISALENTO03614nam 22006615 450 991064588840332120251008140619.09783031193057(electronic bk.)978303119304010.1007/978-3-031-19305-7(OCoLC)1366057841(MiAaPQ)EBC7186269(Au-PeEL)EBL7186269(CKB)26050265300041(DE-He213)978-3-031-19305-7(EXLCZ)992605026530004120230123d2023 u| 0engurcz#---auuuutxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierBeing as Relation in Luce Irigaray /by Emma R. Jones1st ed. 2023.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan,2023.1 online resource (172 pages)Print version: Jones, Emma R. Being As Relation in Luce Irigaray Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2023 9783031193040 ebook version : 9783031193057. Includes bibliographical references and index.1. Introduction: Being and Sexuate Difference -- 2. Relation and RefusaL: Irigaray and Lacan -- 3. Hearing Silence, Speaking Language: Irigaray and Heidegger -- 4. The Enunciation of Place: Dialogues -- 5. Speaking at the Limit: Ethics, Ontology, Language -- 6. Love and (Re) Birth at the Limit.Many scholars have struggled with Irigaray’s focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is “ontological,” wondering if this implies a problematically naïve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis. By tracing the notion of relation throughout Irigaray’s work, this book identifies a rigorous philosophical continuity between the three self-identified “phases” in Irigaray’s thought (despite some critics’ concerns that there is a discontinuity between these phases) and clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray’s conceptualization of sexuate difference – one that always already implies an ethical project. The text demonstrates that an understanding of Irigaray’s Heideggerian inheritance – especially prominent in her later texts – is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings. This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, feminism, and psychotherapy.FeminismFeminist theoryContinental philosophySocial sciencesPhilosophyPsychoanalysisFeminism and Feminist TheoryContinental PhilosophySocial PhilosophyPsychoanalysisFeminism.Feminist theory.Continental philosophy.Social sciencesPhilosophy.Psychoanalysis.Feminism and Feminist Theory.Continental Philosophy.Social Philosophy.Psychoanalysis.194111Jones Emma R.1275717MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQ9910645888403321Being As Relation in Luce Irigaray3006287UNINA