01073nam a2200277 i 4500991002640459707536040705r19721985it 00 ita d8815009434b1295441x-39ule_instScuola per Assistenti socialiita501Popper, Karl R.159114Congetture e confutazioni :lo sviluppo della conoscenza scientifica /Karl R. Popper ; trad. di G. PancaldiBologna :Il Mulino,1972 (stampa 1985)xii, 724 p. ;22 cmCollezione di testi e di studi.FilosofiaTrad. di: Conjectures and refutationsFilosofia della scienzaEpistemologiaPancaldi, Giuliano.b1295441x12-10-1205-07-04991002640459707536LE024 SOC CL II 1012024000030629le021ex DUSS-E0.00-l- 00000.i1355280605-07-04Congetture e confutazioni186721UNISALENTOle02105-07-04ma -itait 0003744oam 22007691c 450 991078416860332120200115203623.01-4725-5982-71-280-80802-097866108080211-84731-059-110.5040/9781472559821(CKB)1000000000338358(EBL)270812(OCoLC)476005646(SSID)ssj0000230452(PQKBManifestationID)12032461(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000230452(PQKBWorkID)10196851(PQKB)10275613(MiAaPQ)EBC1772726(OCoLC)191747351(UtOrBLW)bpp09255778(MiAaPQ)EBC270812(Au-PeEL)EBL270812(OCoLC)936848015(EXLCZ)99100000000033835820140929d2006 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrThe public law/private law divide une entente assez cordiale? = La distinction du droit public et du droit prive : regards français et britanniques edited by Mark Freedland and Jean-Bernard Auby1st ed.Oxford Portland, Oregon Hart Publishing 2006.1 online resource (269 p.)Studies of the Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law v. 2Papers from a series of joint seminars between colleagues from the University of Paris II and the Oxford University Law Faculty held in Oxford in July 2000 and in Paris in July 2001Extended and re-ordered version of papers previously published in 2004 by LGDJ, Paris1-84113-635-2 Includes bibliographical referencesINTRODUCTION GENERALE -- GENERAL INTRODUCTION -- PREMIERE PARTIE -- PART ONE -- APPROCHES FRANAISES -- THE FRENCH VISION -- DEUXIEME PARTIE -- PART TWO -- THE BRITISH VISION -- APPROCHES BRITANNIQUESThe contributions brought together in this book derive from joint seminars, held by scholars between colleagues from the University of Oxford and the University of Paris II. Their starting point is the original divergence between the two jurisdictions, with the initial rejection of the public-private divide in English Law, but on the other hand its total acceptance as natural in French Law. Then, they go on to demonstrate that the two systems have converged, the British one towards a certain degree of acceptance of the division, the French one towards a growing questioning of it. However this is not the only part of the story, since both visions are now commonly coloured and affected by European Law and by globalisation, which introduces new tensions into our legal understanding of what is "public" and what is "private"Studies of the Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law ;v. 2.Distinction du droit public et du droit prive :regards français et britanniquesPublic lawFranceCongressesConstitutional & administrative lawPublic lawGreat BritainCongressesCivil lawFranceCongressesCivil lawGreat BritainCongressesComparative lawCongressesPublic lawPublic lawCivil lawCivil lawComparative law342Auby Jean-BernardFreedland M. R(Mark Robert),UtOrBLWUtOrBLWUkLoBPBOOK9910784168603321The public law3818665UNINA