01135nam a2200253 i 450099100189136970753620020503154642.0000704s1971 it ||| | ita b10287280-39ule_instEXGIL93198ExLBiblioteca Interfacoltàita370Convegno di studio su Problemi e prospettive dell'educazione contemporanea <3. ; 1971 ; Firenze>465988Atti del 3. Convegno nazionale dell'Associazione italiana Fulbright, Sezione fiorentina, Firenze, 3-4 maggio 1971Firenze :IPIA,1971200 p. ;23 cm.EducazioneCongressi1961Associazione italiana Fulbright :Sezione di Firenze.b1028728002-04-1427-06-02991001891369707536LE002 Ped. I H 171LE002-38901/P3le002-E0.00-l- 00000.i1033994227-06-02Atti del 3. Convegno nazionale dell'Associazione italiana Fulbright, Sezione fiorentina, Firenze, 3-4 maggio 1971209972UNISALENTOle00201-01-00ma -itait 0103606oam 22005294a 450 991040413190332120230621140529.0(CKB)4100000011302000(OCoLC)1154785935(MdBmJHUP)muse85645(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/43805(oapen)doab43805(EXLCZ)99410000001130200020200518e20202019 uy 0engur|||||||nn|ntxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierConflict and Cultural HeritageA Moral Analysis of the Challenges of Heritage Protection /Helen Frowe and Derek MatraversGetty Publications2019Baltimore, Maryland :Project Muse,2020©20201 online resource (1 EPUB unpaged.)J. Paul Getty Trust occasional papers in cultural heritage policy ;number 31-60606-640-4 Includes bibliographical references.In the third issue of the J. Paul Getty Trust Occasional Papers in Cultural Heritage Policy series, authors Helen Frowe and Derek Matravers pivot from the earlier tone of the series in discussing the appropriate response to attacks on cultural heritage with their paper, "Conflict and Cultural Heritage: A Moral Analysis of the Challenges of Heritage Protection." While Frowe and Matravers acknowledge the importance of cultural heritage, they assert that we must more carefully consider the complex moral dimensions--the inevitable serious consequences to human beings--before formulating policy to forcefully protect it. A number of writers and thinkers working on the problem of preserving the world's most treasured monuments, sites, and objects today cite what Frowe and Matravers call extrinsic and intrinsic justifications for the protection of cultural heritage. These are arguments that maintain that protecting heritage will be a key means to achieve other important goals, like the prevention of genocide, or arguments that heritage deserves to be forcefully protected for its own sake. Frowe and Matravers deconstruct both types of justifications, demonstrating a lack of clear evidence for a causal relationship between the destruction of cultural heritage and atrocities like genocide and arguing that the defense of heritage must not be treated with the same weight or urgency, or according to the same international policies, as the defense of human lives. By calling for expanded theory and empirical data and the consideration of morality in the crafting of international policy vis-à-vis cultural heritage protection, Frowe and Matravers present a thoughtful critique that enriches this important series and adds to the ongoing dialogue in the field.J. Paul Getty Trust occasional papers in cultural heritage policy ;no.3.Art and warArchitectureConservation and restorationArtConservation and restorationCultural propertyProtectionElectronic books. Art and war.ArchitectureConservation and restoration.ArtConservation and restoration.Cultural propertyProtection.Frowe Helen1022645Matravers DerekJ. Paul Getty Trust,MdBmJHUPMdBmJHUPBOOK9910404131903321Conflict and Cultural Heritage2429215UNINA