01020nam a2200301 i 450099100094851970753620020507180416.0930604s1990 uk ||| | eng 0198535538b10779899-39ule_instLE01304740ExLDip.to Matematicaeng514.3AMS 57NAMS 57N13Donaldson, S. K.52791The geometry of four-manifolds /S. K. Donaldson, P. B. KronheimerOxford :Oxford Univ. Press,1990440 p. ;24 cm.Oxford mathematical monographsTopology of Four-manifoldsKronheimer, P. B..b1077989923-02-1728-06-02991000948519707536LE013 57N DON11 (1990)12013000123677le013-E0.00-l- 03030.i1087930428-06-02Geometry of four-manifolds921845UNISALENTOle01301-01-93ma -enguk 4103164nam 2200613 a 450 991077973820332120230725061551.03-11-032248-X10.1515/9783110322484(CKB)2550000001096918(EBL)1195529(OCoLC)851970842(SSID)ssj0000801489(PQKBManifestationID)11508637(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000801489(PQKBWorkID)10774491(PQKB)11763160(MiAaPQ)EBC1195529(DE-B1597)210962(OCoLC)1013957460(OCoLC)853248961(DE-B1597)9783110322484(Au-PeEL)EBL1195529(CaPaEBR)ebr10728639(CaONFJC)MIL503452(EXLCZ)99255000000109691820130709d2010 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrOn determining what there is[electronic resource] the identity of ontological categories in Aquinas, Scotus and Lowe /Paul SymingtonFrankfurt Ontos Verlag20101 online resource (183 p.)EIDE : foundations of ontology ;v. 2Description based upon print version of record.3-11-032218-8 1-299-72201-6 Includes bibliographical references. Frontmatter -- TABLE OF CONTENTS -- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS -- INTRODUCTION -- CHAPTER ONE: AQUINAS ON ESTABLISHING THE IDENTITY OF ARISTOTLE'S CATEGORIES -- CHAPTER TWO: SCOTUS'S CRITICISM OF AQUINAS'S DERIVATION OF THE CATEGORIES -- CHAPTER THREE: A RECONSIDERATION AND DEFENSE OF AQUINAS'S POSITION -- CHAPTER FOUR: LOGICAL SYNTAX AND LOWE'S FOUR-CATEGORY ONTOLOGY -- CONCLUSION -- WORKS CITED -- BackmatterGenerally, categories are understood to express the most general features of reality. Yet, since categories have this special status, obtaining a correct list of them is difficult. This question is addressed by examining how Thomas Aquinas establishes the list of categories through a technique of identifying diversity in how predicates are per se related to their subjects. A sophisticated critique by Duns Scotus of this position is also examined, a rejection which is fundamentally grounded in the idea that no real distinction can be made from a logical one. It is argued Aquinas's approach can be rehabilitated in that real distinctions are possible when specifically considering per se modes of predication. This discussion between Aquinas and Scotus bears fruit in a contemporary context insofar as it bears upon, strengthens, and seeks to correct E. J. Lowe's four-category ontology view regarding the identity and relation of the categories. Eide ;v. 2.OntologyOntology.230.6Symington Paul1499450MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910779738203321On determining what there is3725478UNINA