01875nam 2200337 450 99657792350331620231215135918.01-5044-8682-X(CKB)4100000012875324(NjHacI)994100000012875324(EXLCZ)99410000001287532420231215d2022 uy 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierIEEE SA 3D Body Processing Industry Connections Comparative Analysis of Anthropometric Methods: Past, Present, and Future /IEEENew York, N.Y. :IEEE,2022.1 online resource (52 pages)The 3DBP IC's Quality subgroup focuses on developing preliminary methods, tools, benchmarks, resources, and testing procedures to define and quantify the quality of 3D models as well as the quality of the critical metadata, such as body landmarks and measurements. To further this goal, the 3DBP IC Group completed a comparative analysis of anthropometric methods focused on body measurements and captured 3D body shapes. The aim of this study is twofold: first, to propose a methodology to assess the compatibility and repeatability of different body measurement extraction methods (e.g., body scanners, smartphone apps, and traditional anthropometry) using consistent criteria, and second, to conduct data collection and the corresponding analyses for the first instance of the application of the proposed methodology.White Paper - Comparative Analysis of Anthropometric MethodsAnthropometryCongressesAnthropometry573.6NjHacINjHaclDOCUMENT996577923503316IEEE SA 3D Body Processing Industry Connections3884074UNISA