01803oam 2200493M 450 991071636820332120200213070558.8(CKB)5470000002520452(OCoLC)1065918731(OCoLC)995470000002520452(EXLCZ)99547000000252045220071213d1926 ua 0engurcn|||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierTo provide for the collection of fees from royalties on production of minerals from leased Indian lands. April 2, 1926. -- Ordered to be printed[Washington, D.C.] :[U.S. Government Printing Office],1926.1 online resource (2 pages)Senate report / 69th Congress, 1st session. Senate ;no. 532[United States congressional serial set ] ;[serial no. 8525]Batch processed record: Metadata reviewed, not verified. Some fields updated by batch processes.FDLP item number not assigned.Fees, AdministrativeCollecting of accountsIndian allotmentsMining leasesIndiansLegislative materials.lcgftFees, Administrative.Collecting of accounts.Indian allotments.Mining leases.Indians.Harreld John WRepublican (OK)1386799WYUWYUOCLCOOCLCQBOOK9910716368203321To provide for the collection of fees from royalties on production of minerals from leased Indian lands. April 2, 1926. -- Ordered to be printed3515057UNINA02493nam 2200277z- 450 991080014860332120230906203136.01-000-15588-9(CKB)4900000001303802(BIP)053770556(BIP)076774510(EXLCZ)99490000000130380220220316c2020uuuu -u- -engOrigin and significance of the Frankfurt School: a Marxist perspectiveRoutledge1 online resource (204 p.) 1-138-97777-2 The term 'Frankfurt School' is used widely, but sometimes loosely, to describe both a group of intellectuals and a specific social theory. Focusing on the formative and most radical years of the Frankfurt School, during the 1930s, this study concentrates on the Frankfurt School's most original contributions made to the work on a 'critical theory of society' by the philosophers Max Horkheimer and Herbert Marcuse, the psychologist Erich Fromm, and the aesthetician Theodor W. Adorno.Phil Slater traces the extent, and ultimate limits, of the Frankfurt School's professed relation to the Marxian critique of political economy. In considering the extent of the relation to revolutionary praxis, he discusses the socio-economic and political history of Weimar Germany in its descent into fascism, and considers the work of such people as Karl Korsch, Wilhelm Reich, Walter Benjamin and Bertolt Brecht, which directs a great deal of critical light on the Frankfurt School.While pinpointing the ultimate limitations of the Frankfurt School's frame of reference, Phil Slater also looks at the role their work played (largely against their wishes) in the emergence of the student anti-authoritarian movement in the 1960s. He shows that, in particular, the analysis of psychic and cultural manipulation was central to the young rebels' theoretical armour, but that even here, the lack of economic class analysis seriously restricts the critical edge of the Frankfurt School's theory. His conclusion is that the only way forward is to rescue the most radical roots of the Frankfurt School's work, and to recast these in the context of a practical theory of economic and political emancipation.Origin and significance of the Frankfurt School301/.01Slater Phil125279BOOK9910800148603321Origin and significance of the Frankfurt School194067UNINA01040nam 2200301z- 450 99657236880331620240228191505.09783748919162(CKB)5600000000786629(EXLCZ)99560000000078662920240117h20242024 |u| |gertxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierGewalt gegen Männer in Partnerschafteneine empirische Untersuchung zur Situation in DeutschlandJonas Schemmel, Laura-Romina Goede, Philipp MüllerBaden-BadenNomos[2024]1 Online RessourceEdition Seehaus [plus] – Resozialisierung – Opferschutz – Restorative JusticeBand 53-7560-1373-1 Schemmel Jonas1592722Goede Laura-Romina1592723Müller Philipp591700CH-ZuSLS UZB ZBBOOK996572368803316Gewalt gegen Männer in Partnerschaften3911520UNISA