03272nam 2200709 450 991046445170332120210422031616.03-11-039500-23-11-034413-010.1515/9783110344134(CKB)3360000000515158(EBL)1652212(SSID)ssj0001402905(PQKBManifestationID)11833637(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001402905(PQKBWorkID)11364788(PQKB)10554728(MiAaPQ)EBC1652212(DE-B1597)246104(OCoLC)898769771(DE-B1597)9783110344134(Au-PeEL)EBL1652212(CaPaEBR)ebr11010191(CaONFJC)MIL808164(EXLCZ)99336000000051515820141031h20152015 uy| 0engur|nu---|u||utxtccrScales and hierarchies a cross-disciplinary perspective /(edited) by Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Andrej L. Malchukov, Marc RichardsBerlin ;Boston :De Gruyter,[2015]©20151 online resource (362 p.)Trends in linguistics. Studies and monographs,1861-4302 ;277Description based upon print version of record.3-11-055541-7 3-11-034400-9 Includes bibliographical references and index.Front matter --Table of contents --1. Introduction --2. Typological evidence against universal effects of referential scales on case alignment --3. Descriptive scales versus comparative scales --4. Generalizing Scales --5. Differential Argument Encoding by Impoverishment --6. Ø-Agreement in Turkana --7. Defective Agree, Case Alternations, and the Prominence of Person --8. Prefixes, Scales and Grammatical Theory --9. Argument Encoding in Direction Systems and Specificity-Driven Agree --10. Towards a typology of split ergativity: A TAM-hierarchy for alignment splits --11. Split Marked-S Case Systems --12. Scales in real-time language comprehension: A review --Subject indexThe volume advances our understanding of the role of scales and hierarchies across the linguistic sciences. Although scales and hierarchies are widely assumed to play a role in the modelling of linguistic phenomena, their status remains controversial, and it is these controversies that the present volume tackles head-on.Trends in linguistics.Studies and monographs ;277.Hierarchy (Linguistics)Grammar, Comparative and generalCaseFunctionalism (Linguistics)Electronic books.Hierarchy (Linguistics)Grammar, Comparative and generalCase.Functionalism (Linguistics)410.1/8ES 172rvkBornkessel-Schlesewsky Ina1979-Malʹchukov A. L(Andreĭ Lʹvovich),Richards MarcMiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910464451703321Scales and hierarchies2470168UNINA02627nam 2200577z- 450 99654035340331620231214133456.0(CKB)4920000000095310(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/44600(EXLCZ)99492000000009531020202102d2019 |y 0engurmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierDeceptive Conducts before the Patent OfficeChallenges for Patent Law and Competition LawNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG20191 electronic resource (335 p.)Munich Intellectual Property Law Center – MIPLC3-8487-6134-3 3-7489-0257-3 In an increasingly harmonized global patent landscape, few issues still distinguish the US patent system as much as its strict–and often criticized–duty of candor and its inequitable conduct doctrine. The EPO and most other countries around the world impose less burdensome disclosure duties upon patent applicants. What is there to learn from the experience in the US? Have these tools resulted in any benefit worth considering? Yet regardless of the disclosure duties imposed upon patent applicants, a deceptive conduct before the Patent Office could lead to unwarranted exclusive rights and have a negative impact on competition. Should antitrust law intervene? Is it a case of sham litigation? This work attempts to answer those questions through a comparative analysis, examining the law and case law in the US and in the EU from both a patent and a competition law perspective and seeking a workable theory of harm.pharmazeutischer Patientirreführendes VerhaltenWettbewerbsrechtPatentanmeldungPatentamthigh courtSupreme Courtinequitable conductCompetition Lawkristalline FormPatentrechtApotexWalker Processtert-Butylaminsalzduty of candorFraud before the Patent OfficePerindoprilScheincharakterAstraZenecaPatent OfficeServierLJ Jacobpatent lawHoss Eugenioauth1287687BOOK996540353403316Deceptive Conducts before the Patent Office3020297UNISA