05410nam 2200673 a 450 991045770700332120200520144314.01-283-35902-2978661335902590-272-7930-6(CKB)2550000000073761(EBL)805816(OCoLC)301279192(SSID)ssj0001012987(PQKBManifestationID)11567713(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001012987(PQKBWorkID)11053287(PQKB)10054514(MiAaPQ)EBC805816(Au-PeEL)EBL805816(CaPaEBR)ebr10517196(EXLCZ)99255000000007376119860922d1986 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrNews interviews[electronic resource] a pragmalinguistic analysis /Andreas H. JuckerAmsterdam ;Philadelphia J. Benjamins19861 online resource (207 p.)Pragmatics & beyond,0166-6258 ;7:4Description based upon print version of record.90-272-2554-0 Bibliography: p. [185]-195.NEWS INTERVIEWS: A PRAGMALINGUISTIC ANALYSIS; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; TABLE OF CONTENTS; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; TRANSCRIPTION NOTATIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS; 1.INTRODUCTION; 1.1 Aim and Scope; 1.2 The Corpus; 1.3 Problems of Definition; 1.3.1 Medium; 1.3.2 Participants; 1.3.3 Topic-coherence; 1.3.4 Form; 1.4 Four Methods of Analysis; 1.4.1 Speech act theory; 1.4.2 Ethnomethodology; 1.4.3 Theory of speech act sequencing; 1.4.4 Conversational inference; 2. ASPECTS OF DURATION; 2.1 Quantificational Studies of Conversation; 2.2 The ""Matarazzo Effect"" in News Interviews2.2.1 Statistical procedure2.2.2 Duration of utterance; 2.2.3 Reaction time latency; 2.2.4 Channel of communication; 2.3 Summary; 3. THE STRUCTURE OF INTERVIEWS; 3.1 Flow-Chart Representation of the Structure of Interviews; 3.1.1 The opening sequence; 3.1.2 The main sequence; 3.1.3 Final sequence; 3.2 Limitations of a Structural Model; 3.2.1 The concept of hierarchy; 3.2.2 Form-function relationship; 3.2.3 Unfalsifiability of the model; 4. CONVERSATIONAL INFERENCE; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Pragmatic Principles; 4.2.1 Grice's Cooperative Principle; 4.2.2 Leech's Politeness Principle4.2.3 Face Threatening Acts (FTAs)4.3 Pragmatic Scales in News Interviews; 4.3.1 The weightiness of interview questions; 4.3.2 13 ways of threatening the interviewee's face; 4.3.2.1 ""Commit yourself to do something""; 4.3.2.2 ""State your opinion""; 4.3.2.3 ""Confirm your opinion (presupposing that it is demeaning)""; 4.3.2.4 ""Accept discrepancy between your opinion and your actions""; 4.3.2.5 ""Accept discrepancy between your opinion and reality""; 4.3.2.6 ""Accept that the reason for doing the action is demeaning""; 4.3.2.7 ""State that the action is demeaning""4.3.2.8 ""Confirm the action""4.3.2.9 ""Take responsibility for the action""; 4.3.2.10 ''Justify the action""; 4.3.2.11 ""Take action against something""; 4.3.2.12 ""State that other1 s face is demeaning""; 4.3.2.13 ""State that your face is demeaning""; 4.3.3 Relative importance of the FT As; 5. THE FORCE OF QUESTIONS; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Syntactic Means of Force Reduction; 5.2.1 Prefaced questions; 5.2.1.1 Preface relating to the interviewee's opinion; 5.2.1.2 Preface relating to what the interviewee has said; 5.2.1.3 Preface relating to the speech act required of the interviewee5.2.1.4 Preface relating to the speech act performed by the interviewer5.2.1.5 Preface relating to the truth conditional status of the proposition; 5.2.2 Non-prefaced questions; 5.2.2.1 Interrogatives; 5.2.2.2 Declaratives; 5.2.2.3 Imperative and moodless questions; 5.2.2.4 Summary; 5.3 Discourse Particles; 5.3.1 ""Well"", ""now"" and ""well now""; 5.3.2 ""But""; 5.3.3 ""And"" and ""so""; 5.4 Cohesion between Questions and Preceding Answers; 5.4.1 ""Topical Shift""; 5.4.2 ""Topic Extension""; 5.4.3 ""Reformulation""; 5.4.4 ""Challenge""; 5.4.5 Summary; 5.5 Pragmatic Means of Weight Reduction5.5.1 Quotation of criticsJucker endeavors to test pragmatic concepts (such as Grice's principles of conversational inference) by applying them to concrete data. This application leads to suggestions for various modifications in the available pragmatic methodology. While pursuing this theoretical goal, he makes a significant contribution to descriptive pragmatics by offering a detailed picture of linguistically relevant aspects of news interviews, which show communicative behavior in 'laboratory conditions' where as many influencing factors as possible are kept stable while the influence of one specific factor at a timPragmatics & beyond ;7:4.Interviewing in journalismPragmaticsSpeech acts (Linguistics)Electronic books.Interviewing in journalism.Pragmatics.Speech acts (Linguistics)401/.9Jucker Andreas H176829MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910457707003321News interviews2026558UNINA01783nam 2200517 450 99649577050331620230505135310.0981-19-6577-3(MiAaPQ)EBC7129864(Au-PeEL)EBL7129864(CKB)25299541900041(PPN)265858275(EXLCZ)992529954190004120230317d2022 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierCapacity allocation mechanisms and coordination in supply chain under demand competition /Jianbin Li, Xueyuan Cai, and Binbin LiSingapore :Springer,[2022]©20221 online resource (258 pages)Uncertainty and Operations ResearchPrint version: Li, Jianbin Capacity Allocation Mechanisms and Coordination in Supply Chain under Demand Competition Singapore : Springer,c2022 9789811965760 Uncertainty and operations research.Business logisticsOperations researchMethodologyLogística industrialthubInvestigació operativathubLlibres electrònicsthubBusiness logistics.Operations researchMethodology.Logística industrialInvestigació operativa658.7Li Jianbin1265529Cai XueyuanLi BinbinMiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK996495770503316Capacity Allocation Mechanisms and Coordination in Supply Chain under Demand Competition2967891UNISA