03030nam 2200589 450 99646648870331620220907180806.03-540-39025-110.1007/BFb0081997(CKB)1000000000437541(SSID)ssj0000326094(PQKBManifestationID)12087660(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000326094(PQKBWorkID)10265748(PQKB)10524148(DE-He213)978-3-540-39025-1(MiAaPQ)EBC5576895(Au-PeEL)EBL5576895(OCoLC)1066184817(MiAaPQ)EBC6842022(Au-PeEL)EBL6842022(PPN)15519450X(EXLCZ)99100000000043754120220907d1987 uy 0engurnn|008mamaatxtccrRational homotopy type a constructive study via the theory of the I*-measure /Wen-tsün Wu1st ed. 1987.Berlin, Germany :Springer,[1987]©19871 online resource (X, 222 p.) Lecture Notes in Mathematics,0075-8434 ;1264Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph0-387-13611-8 3-540-13611-8 Fundamental concepts. Measure and calculability -- Dga and minimal model -- The de rham-sullivan theorem and I*-measure -- I*-measure and homotopy -- I*-measure of a homogeneous space — The cartan theorem -- Effective computation and axiomatic system of I*-measure -- I*-measures connected with fibrations.This comprehensive monograph provides a self-contained treatment of the theory of I*-measure, or Sullivan's rational homotopy theory, from a constructive point of view. It centers on the notion of calculability which is due to the author himself, as are the measure-theoretical and constructive points of view in rational homotopy. The I*-measure is shown to differ from other homology and homotopy measures in that it is calculable with respect to most of the important geometric constructions encountered in algebraic topology. This approach provides a new method of treatment and leads to various new results. In particular, an axiomatic system of I*-measure is formulated, quite different in spirit from the usual Eilenberg-Steenrod axiomatic system for homology, and giving at the same time an algorithmic method of computation of the I*-measure in concrete cases. The book will be of interest to researchers in rational homotopy theory and will provide them with new ideas and lines of research to develop further.Lecture Notes in Mathematics,0075-8434 ;1264Measure theoryMeasure theory.514.24Wu Wen-tsün55251MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK996466488703316Rational homotopy type78536UNISA04394nam 2200709 a 450 991095694200332120240514061604.01-283-35955-3978661335955190-272-8057-6(CKB)2550000000072941(EBL)805849(OCoLC)769342243(SSID)ssj0000552186(PQKBManifestationID)11387340(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000552186(PQKBWorkID)10564802(PQKB)11021018(MiAaPQ)EBC805849(Au-PeEL)EBL805849(CaPaEBR)ebr10517123(CaONFJC)MIL335955(DE-B1597)729666(DE-B1597)9789027280572(EXLCZ)99255000000007294120030226d1982 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierTopical relevance in argumentation /Douglas N. Walton1st ed.Amsterdam ;Philadelphia J. Benjamins19821 online resource (89 pages)Pragmatics & beyond,0166-6258 ;3:890-272-2524-9 Includes bibliography (p. 76-79) and index.TOPICAL RELEVANCE IN ARGUMENTATION; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Dedication; Acknowledgements; Table of contents; 1. CONVERSATIONAL ALLEGATIONS OF IRRELEVANCE; 1.0 Objective of Study; 1.1 Dual Nature of Pragmatic Analysis; 1.2 Disputation Theory; 1.3 Standard Preconceptions o f Irrelevance; 1.4 Fallacies o f Emotional Distraction; 1.5 Ad Misericordiam Arguments; 1.6 A Contrastive Case Study; 1.7 The Ad Hominem Fallacy; 1.8 Relevant Answers to Questions; IMMIGRATION TIMOTHY LEARY: REASON ALLOWED TO ENTER CANADA; 1.9 A Second Case Study of Question-RelevanceENERGY SALE OF GASOLINE TO UNITED STATES CITIZENS 1.10 Function o f Questioning in Parliamentary Debate; 2. PROPOSITIONAL INFERENCES IN DISPUTATION; 2.0 Relevance in Games of Dialogue; 2.1 Refutation and Propositional Structure; 2.2 Classical Propositional Logic: Basic Elements; 2.3 Valid Arguments in Classical Logic; 2.4 Astounding Inferences in Classical Logic; 2.5 Relatedness Propositional Logic: Basic Elements; 2.6 Valid Arguments in Relatedness Logic; 2.7 The Astounding Inferences Revisited; 2.8 The Propositional Core of Disputation; 3. PARADOXES, SOPHISMS AND RELATEDNESS3.0 The Meaning of Relatedness 3.1 Act-Sequences and Relatedness; 3.2 Subject-Matter Contents of Propositions; 3.3 Paradoxes and Astounding Inferences; 3.4 Missing Factors; 3.5 Needed Premises in Inferences; 3.6 Irrelevant Premises; 3.7. Pluralism of Concepts of Relevance; 3.8 Information Inclusion; 4. CRITICISMS OF IRRELEVANCE IN GAMES OF DIALOGUE; 4.0 Six Types of Criticisms of Irrelevance; 4.1 Varieties of Games; 4.2 Strong and Weak Refutation; 4.3 Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Games; 4.4 Misconception of Refutation; 4.5 Pertinence; 4.6 Question-Answer Relevance4.7 Types of Questions and Answers 4.8 Rules o f Responding; 4.9 Types of Relevance Compared; 4.10 Conditionals in Disputation; NOTES; REFERENCES; INDEXIt is a longstanding if not altogether coherent tradition of logic and rhetorical studies that an argument can be incorrect or fallacious in virtue of some proposition in it being "irrelevant". This monograph clarifies that tradition. Non-classical propositional calculi, including relevance logics and relatedness logics, are juxtaposed against conversational criticisms of irrelevance in natural argumentation, e.g. in parliamentary debates. The object is to see if there is a reasonable way of evaluating criticisms like "That's beside the point!" or "That's irrelevant!".Pragmatics & beyond ;3:8.ReasoningRelevance (Philosophy)Debates and debatingLogicReasoning.Relevance (Philosophy)Debates and debating.Logic.160ER 640rvkWalton Douglas N214601MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910956942003321Topical relevance in argumentation606378UNINA