01603nam 2200397Ia 450 99639743730331620200824132255.0(CKB)4940000000061573(EEBO)2240919262(OCoLC)ocm33150160e(OCoLC)33150160(EXLCZ)99494000000006157319950918d1635 uy |engurbn||||a|bb|By the King[electronic resource] a proclamation for preseruation of grounds for making of saltpeter, and to restore such grounds as are now destroyed, and to command assistance to be giuen to His Maiesties saltpeter- makersImprinted at London By Robert Barker, Printer to the Kings most Excellent Maiestie: And by the Assignes of Iohn Bill1634 [i.e., 1635][2] leavesCaption title.Imprint from colophon."Giuen at Our Court at Whitehall, the fourteenth day of March, in the tenth yeere of Our Reigne of England, Scotland, France, and Ireland."Reproduction of original in: Society of Antiquaries.eebo-0147Saltpeter industryEnglandEarly works to 1800Nitrogen industriesEarly works to 1800Great BritainHistoryCharles I, 1625-1649Saltpeter industryNitrogen industriesCharlesKing of England,1600-1649.793295EBKEBKWaOLNBOOK996397437303316By the King2297757UNISA04915nam 2200445z- 450 991022005820332120210211(CKB)3800000000216196(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/49598(oapen)doab49598(EXLCZ)99380000000021619620202102d2016 |y 0engurmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierHow Humans Recognize Objects: Segmentation, Categorization and Individual IdentificationFrontiers Media SA20161 online resource (265 p.)Frontiers Research Topics2-88919-940-1 Human beings experience a world of objects: bounded entities that occupy space and persist through time. Our actions are directed toward objects, and our language describes objects. We categorize objects into kinds that have different typical properties and behaviors. We regard some kinds of objects - each other, for example - as animate agents capable of independent experience and action, while we regard other kinds of objects as inert. We re-identify objects, immediately and without conscious deliberation, after days or even years of non-observation, and often following changes in the features, locations, or contexts of the objects being re-identified. Comparative, developmental and adult observations using a variety of approaches and methods have yielded a detailed understanding of object detection and recognition by the visual system and an advancing understanding of haptic and auditory information processing. Many fundamental questions, however, remain unanswered. What, for example, physically constitutes an "object"? How do specific, classically-characterizable object boundaries emerge from the physical dynamics described by quantum theory, and can this emergence process be described independently of any assumptions regarding the perceptual capabilities of observers? How are visual motion and feature information combined to create object information? How are the object trajectories that indicate persistence to human observers implemented, and how are these trajectory representations bound to feature representations? How, for example, are point-light walkers recognized as single objects? How are conflicts between trajectory-driven and feature-driven identifications of objects resolved, for example in multiple-object tracking situations? Are there separate "what" and "where" processing streams for haptic and auditory perception? Are there haptic and/or auditory equivalents of the visual object file? Are there equivalents of the visual object token? How are object-identification conflicts between different perceptual systems resolved? Is the common assumption that "persistent object" is a fundamental innate category justified? How does the ability to identify and categorize objects relate to the ability to name and describe them using language? How are features that an individual object had in the past but does not have currently represented? How are categorical constraints on how objects move or act represented, and how do such constraints influence categorization and the re-identification of individuals? How do human beings re-identify objects, including each other, as persistent individuals across changes in location, context and features, even after gaps in observation lasting months or years? How do human capabilities for object categorization and re-identification over time relate to those of other species, and how do human infants develop these capabilities? What can modeling approaches such as cognitive robotics tell us about the answers to these questions? Primary research reports, reviews, and hypothesis and theory papers addressing questions relevant to the understanding of perceptual object segmentation, categorization and individual identification at any scale and from any experimental or modeling perspective are solicited for this Research Topic. Papers that review particular sets of issues from multiple disciplinary perspectives or that advance integrative hypotheses or models that take data from multiple experimental approaches into account are especially encouraged.How Humans Recognize ObjectsPsychologybicsscbindingComparative NeuroscienceComputational modellingconceptsDevelopmental Neurosciencemulti-sensory integrationPerceptionTouchVisionPsychologyChris Fieldsauth1331051BOOK9910220058203321How Humans Recognize Objects: Segmentation, Categorization and Individual Identification3040076UNINA