02289nam 2200409 n 450 99639567700331620200824120843.0(CKB)3810000000013487(EEBO)2248516612(UnM)99872827e(UnM)99872827(EXLCZ)99381000000001348719860604d1646 uy |engurbn||||a|bb|A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme[electronic resource] the first is, that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered. With a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme. Also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being (as he saith) that which should have beene disputed by him, and Mr. Knowles, and some others; against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford. The second point is, that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water: with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it. /By T.BLondon printed for Henry Shepard at the Bible in Tower-street, and for WIlliam Ley at his shop in Pauls Church-yard neere Doctors Commons.1646[1+] pT.B. = Thomas Bakewell.Annotation on Thomason copy: "Jan: 19th 1645"; the second 6 in imprint date crossed out.A fragment: title page only, much stained and with print show-through.Reproduction of original in the British Library.eebo-0018Infant baptismEarly works to 1800AnabaptistsControversial literatureEarly works to 1800Title pagesEngland17th cent.Infant baptismAnabaptistsBakewell Thomasb. 1618 or 19.1003030Cu-RivESCu-RivESCStRLINWaOLNBOOK996395677003316A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme2302632UNISA