01898nam 2200349Ia 450 99639521180331620221103135053.0(CKB)4330000000322068(EEBO)2240878493(OCoLC)13687020(EXLCZ)99433000000032206819860604d1646 uy |engurbn||||a|bb|A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme[electronic resource] the first is that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered : with a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme : also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being as he saith that which should have beene disputed by him and Mr. Knowles and some others against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford : the second point is that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it /by T.BLondon Printed for Henry Shepard ... and for William Ley ...1646[2], 30 pWritten by Thomas Bakewell. Cf. Wing.Reproduction of original in the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign Campus). Library.eebo-0167Infant baptismEarly works to 1800Infant baptismBakewell Thomasb. 1618 or 19.1003030EAAEAAm/cEAAWaOLNBOOK996395211803316A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme2302632UNISA