01586nam 2200373 n 450 99639279910331620200824121802.0(CKB)4940000000113024(EEBO)2240946682(UnM)99873494e(UnM)99873494(EXLCZ)99494000000011302419851024d1641 uy |engurbn||||a|bb|The argument of Nicholas Fuller of Grayes Inne esquire, in the case of Tho. Lad, and Rich. Mansell his clients[electronic resource] Wherein it is plainly proved, that the ecclesiasticall commissioners have no power by their commission, to imprison, or to fine any of his Majesties subjects, or to put them to the oath ex officioLondon Printed for N. Vavasour1641[4], 32 p. portFrontispiece port.: William Laud Arch-B: of Canterbury Prymat of England. W.M. sculp.Reproduction of the original in the British Library.eebo-0018Ecclesiastical lawEnglandEarly works to 1800Great BritainReligion17th centuryEarly works to 1800Ecclesiastical lawFuller Nicholas1543-1620.1007971Marshall Williamfl. 1650.1010750Cu-RivESCu-RivESCStRLINWaOLNBOOK996392799103316The argument of Nicholas Fuller of Grayes Inne esquire, in the case of Tho. Lad, and Rich. Mansell his clients2408603UNISA