02029nam 2200373 n 450 99639199290331620200824121647.0(CKB)4940000000109761(EEBO)2240917461(UnM)99865621e(UnM)99865621(EXLCZ)99494000000010976119940220d1651 uy |engurbn||||a|bb|Conscience eased: or, the main scruple which hath hitherto stuck most with conscionable men, against the taking of the Engagement removed[electronic resource] Where amongst other things is shewed, first, how farre the oath of allegiance, and the nationall League and Covenant are obligations; either in their legall intents unalterable or at this time no more binding and alterable. Secondly. How farre in a free people the subordinate officers of the state, have a right to judge of the proceedings of a king in that state. Thirdly, how Zedekia'es case in breaking his oath to the king of Babylon, and our case in making use of our freedome from the oath of allegiance, and supremacie to the king of England doe differ. /The author, John DuryLondon Printed for T.H. in Russell-street, neere the Piazza of the Covent-Garden1651[2], 37 [i.e. 38] pPages 25-38 misnumbered.Annotation on Thomason copy: "feb.25 1650", also the last two numbers of the imprint date have been marked through.Reproduction of the original in the British Library.eebo-0018Loyalty oathsEnglandEarly works to 1800Loyalty oathsDury John1596-1680.820763Cu-RivESCu-RivESUk-ESCStRLINWaOLNBOOK996391992903316Conscience eased: or, the main scruple which hath hitherto stuck most with conscionable men, against the taking of the Engagement, removed2302757UNISA