01379nam 2200313 n 450 99638364820331620221108044557.0(CKB)1000000000589997(EEBO)2240927272(UnM)9959216500971(EXLCZ)99100000000058999719810218d1712 uh engurbn||||a|bb|1. We conceive such an order, as is propos'd in the question, to be absolutely necessary, because we are fully convinc'd that the Duke of Ormond does lie under some order of restraint from acting offensively, ..[electronic resource][London s.n.1712]1 sheetA protest by several lords, 28 May 1712, against the rejection of an address to the Queen, concerning the restraining orders imposed on the Duke of Ormond.Reproduction of original in the British Library.eebo-0018Great BritainPolitics and government1660-1714Uk-ESUk-ESCStRLINCu-RivESBOOK9963836482033161. We conceive such an order, as is propos'd in the question, to be absolutely necessary, because we are fully convinc'd that the Duke of Ormond does lie under some order of restraint from acting offensively, .2357617UNISA