00890cam0-2200325---450-99000406575040332120150303112617.084-376-0526-1000406575FED01000406575(Aleph)000406575FED0100040657519990604d1985----km-y0itay50------baspaES--------001byFarsasDiego Sánchez de Badajozedición de Miguel Angel Pérez PriegoMadridCatedra1985259 p.18 cmLetras hispánicas71862.322itaSánchez,Diego385067Pérez Priego,Miguel AngelITUNINARICAUNIMARCBK990004065750403321862.3 SANC 1Bibl.20551FLFBCFLFBCFarsas94042UNINA01890nam 2200577 a 450 99624801460331620221108012540.00-86091-081-40-86091-786-X2027/heb05045(CKB)1000000000548290(dli)HEB05045(SSID)ssj0000333419(PQKBManifestationID)11295147(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000333419(PQKBWorkID)10355165(PQKB)10673368(MiU)MIU01000000000000005810460(EXLCZ)99100000000054829019880718d1984 uy 0engurmnummmmuuuutxtccrThe restoration of order the normalization of Czechoslovakia, 1969-1976 /Milan Šimečka ; with a preface by Zdenek Mlynar ; translated by A.G. BrianLondon Versoc19841 online resource (167 p. )Translation of: Obnovení pořádku.ACLS Humanities E-Book.Restoration of OrderRESTORATION OF ORDER: THE NORMALIZATION OF CZECHOSLOVAKIA 1969–1976THE RESTORATION OF ORDERCentral EuropeHILCCRegions & Countries - EuropeHILCCHistory & ArchaeologyHILCCCzechoslovakiaPolitics and government1968-1989CzechoslovakiaHistoryIntervention, 1968Central EuropeRegions & Countries - EuropeHistory & Archaeology943.7/043Šimečka Milan1230230Brain A. GAmerican Council of Learned Societies.MiUMiUBOOK996248014603316The restoration of order2855815UNISA02388aam 2200337 n 450 99109858806033212025061810222383-8142-262-0(CKB)4100000008207477(ceeol)ceeol839191(CEEOL)839191(EXLCZ)99410000000820747720252218d2018 ||l |polJedna Rosja w systemie politycznym Federacji RosyjskiejMichał SłowikowskiŁódź [Poland] Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego20181 online resource (1 p. 550)83-8142-261-2 The starting point in this discussion on the place and role of United Russia in the political system of the Russian Federation in the years 2001–2016 is the premise that it is a specific party type within the family of authoritarian parties. Its basic characteristics are direct ties with the ruling faction – the real decision-making centre within a particular political system – and a stabilizing influence over an authoritarian regime. This type of authoritarian parties is internally heterogeneous because parties differ in their actual contribution to the stabilization of an authoritarian system and in the degree of their internal and external institutonalisation, mainly with respect to decision-making autonomy and systemic structure. Consequently, two party types can be distinguished: the dominant type and the ruling type. United Russia has not acquired any typical features of a perfect dominant party in the 15 years of its existence. It has definitively come closer in that period to an ideal type of a ruling party, even though it differed from the ruling parties of the Russian political system in the 1990s. Considering the degree of its institutonalisation and the range of its actual powers, it can be argued that United Russia should be best described as a dominant ruling party.Politics / Political SciencesGovernment/Political systemsPolitics / Political SciencesGovernment/Political systemsSłowikowski Michał1826355Central and Eastern European Online LibraryceeolceeolBOOK9910985880603321Jedna Rosja w systemie politycznym Federacji Rosyjskiej4394325UNINA