01085nam--2200361---450-99000141084020331620050506113133.0000141084USA01000141084(ALEPH)000141084USA0100014108420040210d1965----km-y0itay0103----baengUS||||||||001yy<<A>> linguistic introduction to the history of EnglishMorton Bloomfield and Leonard NewmarkNew YorkKnopf1965XVII, 376, XXI p.22 cm20012001001-------2001BLOOMFIELD,Morton558637NEWMARK,Leonard558638ITsalbcISBD990001410840203316IV.2. 407(XII W 39)21456 L.M.XII WBKUMASIAV51020040210USA011802PATRY9020040406USA011739COPAT39020050506USA011131Linguistic introduction to the history of English930074UNISA03995nam 22007455 450 991029966290332120230810184018.03-319-11400-X10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2(CKB)3710000000269655(EBL)1967818(SSID)ssj0001372486(PQKBManifestationID)11802177(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001372486(PQKBWorkID)11303932(PQKB)10568045(DE-He213)978-3-319-11400-2(MiAaPQ)EBC1967818(PPN)182099288(EXLCZ)99371000000026965520141029d2015 u| 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrInterdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims /by C. F. Gethmann, M. Carrier, G. Hanekamp, M. Kaiser, G. Kamp, S. Lingner, M. Quante, F. Thiele1st ed. 2015.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2015.1 online resource (207 p.)Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment,1860-4811 ;43Description based upon print version of record.3-319-11399-2 Includes bibliographical references.Introduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts. The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment,1860-4811 ;43SciencePhilosophyEconomic developmentKnowledge, Sociology ofPhilosophy of ScienceEconomic Development, Innovation and GrowthSociology of Knowledge and DiscourseSciencePhilosophy.Economic development.Knowledge, Sociology of.Philosophy of Science.Economic Development, Innovation and Growth.Sociology of Knowledge and Discourse.10306.42338926501Gethmann C. Fauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1057839Carrier Mauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/autHanekamp Gauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/autKaiser Mauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/autKamp Gauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/autLingner Sauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/autQuante Mauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/autThiele Fauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/autBOOK9910299662903321Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims2494870UNINA