05851nam 2200697Ia 450 991096999680332120200520144314.097866121565719781282156579128215657897890272942899027294283(CKB)1000000000033120(OCoLC)70725191(CaPaEBR)ebrary10087043(SSID)ssj0000141259(PQKBManifestationID)11134520(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000141259(PQKBWorkID)10058374(PQKB)11637877(MiAaPQ)EBC622491(Au-PeEL)EBL622491(CaPaEBR)ebr10087043(CaONFJC)MIL215657(OCoLC)237390382(DE-B1597)720420(DE-B1597)9789027294289(EXLCZ)99100000000003312020050602d2005 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrDramatized discourse the Mandarin Chinese BA-construction /Zhuo Jing-Schmidt1st ed.Amsterdam ;Philadelphia J. Benjamins Pub. Co.20051 online resource (360 p.) Studies in functional and structural linguistics ;0165-7712Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph9789027215659 9027215650 Includes bibliographcial references and index.Dramatized Discourse -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC data -- Dedication -- Table of contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- List of figures and tables -- Notational conventions -- Abbreviations -- Introduction -- Database -- The syntax of the ba-construction -- 3.1. Compositional properties of the ba-construction -- 3.2. The ba-construction and mood -- 3.2.1. Indicative -- 3.2.2. Imperative -- 3.2.3. Interrogative -- 3.2.4. Subjunctive -- 3.3. The ba-construction and modality -- 3.4. The ba-construction and negation -- 3.5. The ba-construction in passive sentences -- 3.6. The ba-construction in causative sentences -- 3.7. The ba-construction as subordinate -- 3.8. Mandarin word order and the ba-construction -- Previous approaches -- 4.1. Disposal -- 4.2. Transitivity -- 4.2.1. Overview -- 4.2.2. What is transitivity? -- 4.3. The causativity approach -- 4.4. The problem -- The hypothesis of discourse dramaticity -- 5.1. The system of discourse dramaticity -- 5.2. The human factor -- 5.2.1. Cognitive salience -- 5.2.2. Subjectivity and emotionality -- 5.3. Redundancy -- Cognitive salience as discourse dramaticity -- 6.1. Cognitive salience at the clause level -- 6.1.1. Cognitive salience and the number of participants -- 6.1.2. Cognitive salience and verbal dynamism -- 6.1.3. Cognitive salience and verbal modification -- 6.1.4. Cognitive salience of event and salient participants -- 6.1.5. Cognitive salience and information structure -- 6.2. Cognitive salience at the trans-clause level -- 6.2.1. Foregrounding properties -- 6.2.2. Textual linking -- Subjectivity and emotionality as discourse dramaticity -- 7.1. The nature of linguistic subjectivity and emotionality -- 7.2. Conceptual metaphors -- 7.3. Intensifiers -- 7.3.1. Intensifying adverbs -- 7.3.2. Intensifying quantifiers -- 7.4. Mood and modality -- 7.4.1. Mood -- 7.4.2. Modality.7.4.3. The potential construction versus the modal verb neng -- 7.5. Frequency variation across discourse types as additional evidence -- An interim conclusion -- The pragmatization of the ba-construction -- 9.1. Evolution and a functional view of syntactic change -- 9.2. Serial verb construction as source of change -- 9.2.1. Formal pressure towards change -- 9.2.2. Functional re-adaptation and its formal repercussions -- 9.3. Regulation and systemization -- 9.3.1. Data -- 9.3.2. Results -- 9.3.3. Discussion -- 9.4. Inadequacies of the OM postulation -- 9.5. Subjectification -- Final remarks -- Notes -- -24pt -- References -- Text material -- Author index -- Subject index -- The series Studies In Functional And Structural Linguistics.Language is a symbolic system of meanings evoked by linguistic forms. The choice of forms in communication is non-arbitrary. Rather, speakers pick those forms whose meanings best convey their discourse intention. The meaning of the Mandarin ba-construction, argues Jing-Schmidt, is discourse dramaticity, a concept that includes high conceptual salience and subjectivity. The ba-construction and its "syntactic variations" are never interchangeable because contrast in their meanings determines difference in their functions. Quantitative analyses based on authentic data validate the postulation of discourse dramaticity. By taking discourse pragmatics seriously, the dramaticity hypothesis enables a unitary explanation that transcends sentence grammar. The diachronic treatment reveals the syntactic change of the ba-construction as an adaptive process of pragmatization, which raises the issue of linguistic evolution as a result of socio-cultural development. This book will be of particular value to readers interested in the interaction between grammar and pragmatics and to teachers confronting the controversy of the ba-construction in foreign language pedagogy.Studies in functional and structural linguistics ;v. 0165-7712.Mandarin Chinese BA-constructionChinese languageSyntaxLinguisticsChinese languageSyntax.Linguistics.495.1/5Jing-Schmidt Zhuo1800388MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910969996803321Dramatized discourse4346971UNINA02261nam0 2200349 i 450000003828020250805201354.0978-88-921-7627-0eBook-PDF20250805d2022----km-y0itay50------baitaITy-------001yysdoug----uuuuuSoluto matrimonio dotem reddirisorsa elettronicaprofili ricostruttivi dello scioglimento del matrimonio e della disciplina giuridica della doteFausto GiumettiTorinoGiappichelli2022X, 146 p.24 cm.1 testo elettronicoDati testuali (1 file)Modalità di accesso: World Wide WebIndice del libro free access:https://digital.casalini.it/9788892176270La ricerca indaga i legami tra lo scioglimento del vincolo coniugale e la disciplina giuridica relativa della restituzione della dote, di cui vengono esaminati profili che si presentano all’interprete profondamente problematici, come la regolamentazione delle retentiones dotali, sia in rapporto all’esercizio dell’actio rei uxoriae che all’accertamento della culpa discidii. A tal proposito, emerge dall’analisi delle fonti una forte conflittualità sorta in sede giudiziale e per la quale i giuristi si dimostrano impegnati in un incessante lavorìo teso a predisporre soluzioni via via sempre più raffinate. Le liti dotali rompevano infatti gli argini di ogni riflessione che avesse propositi sistematizzanti ed esprimevano tutta la disorganicità di una materia che precludeva agli operatori del diritto di elaborare canoni interpretativi unitari.2001Soluto matrimonio dotem reddi4435389DoteDiritto romanoIus Romanum346.3701623Diritto privato. Matrimonio. Italia anticaGiumetti,Fausto070749845ITUNIPARTHENOPE20250805RICAUNIMARChttps://digital.casalini.it/9788892176270Accesso limitato alla rete di Ateneo Università di Napoli "Parthenope"Data ultima consultazione: 2025-08-05000038280E-BOOK49891NAVA12025Soluto matrimonio dotem reddi4435389UNIPARTHENOPE