01038nam0 22002531i 450 UON0009270220231205102518.20420020107d1988 |0itac50 bamulIT|||| |||||Studi sulla città anticaAtti del Convegno di Studi sulla città etrusca e italica preromanaBolognaIst. per la Storia di Bologna1970 431 p.tav.f.t. ; 26 cm001UON000876262001 Convegni e Colloqui1ArcheologiaEmilia RomagnaUONC027380FIITBolognaUONL000085HARCHITETTURAAIstituto per la Storia di BolognaUONV259876650ITSOL20250411RICASIBA - SISTEMA BIBLIOTECARIO DI ATENEOUONSIUON00092702SIBA - SISTEMA BIBLIOTECARIO DI ATENEOSI H 065 SI MC 2725 5 Studi sulla città antica177516UNIOR03858nam 22005895 450 991088787990332120250423080152.03-031-69055-910.1007/978-3-031-69055-6(MiAaPQ)EBC31679498(Au-PeEL)EBL31679498(CKB)35559655800041(DE-He213)978-3-031-69055-6(EXLCZ)993555965580004120240914d2024 u| 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierDemocracy and Lawlessness The Penitentiary Laws and Civil Disobedience in Norway 1928-1931 /by Hans Petter Graver1st ed. 2024.Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :Imprint: Springer,2024.1 online resource (167 pages)3-031-69054-0 Grandfather -- The years of great struggle -- The creation of the Penitentiary Law -- Challenging the Arbitration Act:The Construction Workers' Dispute -- Criminal law against industrial action -- The battle for the lay judges -- Civil disobedience and the legitimacy of the actions -- All’s well that ends well -- Epilogue.The book addresses efforts to politically influence and curb the judicial system, by telling the story of the enactment of controversial laws in Norway in 1927. It draws parallels to current challenges to the autonomy of the legal order, both in countries where populist forces seek control over the courts, and in other countries where increasing levels of conflict, such as around the climate crisis and the pandemic, challenge the rule of law. In 1927 the Norwegian Parliament enacted three laws that changes the rules of the game in the relation between Labor and Capital. The law was weaponized in benefit of the employers. By this, the legislature departed from the classic ideal of equality before the law and law’s autonomy as a neutral order. The new laws were called the penitentiary laws. The demonstrations against one of the laws, the Arbitration Act in 1928 were the largest manifestation of civil disobedience in Norwegian history. They provoked a level of lawlessness that has not been matched, with exception of the situation during the German occupation 1940-1945. The book analyses the events with the aid of the theory of civil disobedience in liberal democracies put forward by the philosopher John Rawls and the theory of the legal complex developed by the socio-legal scholars Terence Halliday, Lucien Karpic, and Malcolm Feeley. This book tells the story of the Penitentiary Laws, how the laws came into being, how they were received and resisted, and how they were defeated through civil disobedience and with the support of a legal complex which reached far into the legal system. The outcome of the conflict may be one of the factors that explain the high level of trust that the legal institutions enjoy in present day Norway.LawPhilosophyLawHistoryLaw and the social sciencesPolitical scienceTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal HistorySocio-Legal StudiesLegal HistoryPolitical TheoryLawPhilosophy.LawHistory.Law and the social sciences.Political science.Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.Socio-Legal Studies.Legal History.Political Theory.342.0854Graver Hans Petter532180MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910887879903321Democracy and Lawlessness4374118UNINA