04274nam 2200733 a 450 991078867100332120211005031559.01-283-89820-90-8122-0647-910.9783/9780812206470(CKB)3240000000065380(OCoLC)822017902(CaPaEBR)ebrary10642751(SSID)ssj0000726882(PQKBManifestationID)11465920(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000726882(PQKBWorkID)10684785(PQKB)11115670(MdBmJHUP)muse17525(DE-B1597)449617(OCoLC)979904889(DE-B1597)9780812206470(Au-PeEL)EBL3441999(CaPaEBR)ebr10642751(CaONFJC)MIL421070(MiAaPQ)EBC3441999(EXLCZ)99324000000006538020120123d2012 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrBanished[electronic resource] common law and the rhetoric of social exclusion in early New England /Nan Goodman1st ed.Philadelphia University of Pennsylvania Pressc20121 online resource (215 p.)Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph0-8122-4427-3 Includes bibliographical references and index.Front matter --Contents --Introduction. A Banishment Primer --Chapter 1. "To Entertain Strangers" --Chapter 2. The "Predicament of Ubi" --Chapter 3. "To Test Their Bloody Laws" --Chapter 4. Deer Island and the Banishment of the Indians --Conclusion. The Ends of Banishment: From the Puritan Colonies to the Borderlands --Notes --Index --AcknowledgmentsA community is defined not only by inclusion but also by exclusion. Seventeenth-century New England Puritans, themselves exiled from one society, ruthlessly invoked the law of banishment from another: over time, hundreds of people were forcibly excluded from this developing but sparsely settled colony. Nan Goodman suggests that the methods of banishment rivaled-even overpowered-contractual and constitutional methods of inclusion as the means of defining people and place. The law and rhetoric that enacted the exclusion of certain parties, she contends, had the inverse effect of strengthening the connections and collective identity of those that remained. Banished investigates the practices of social exclusion and its implications through the lens of the period's common law. For Goodman, common law is a site of negotiation where the concepts of community and territory are more fluid and elastic than has previously been assumed for Puritan society. Her legal history brings fresh insight to well-known as well as more obscure banishment cases, including those of Anne Hutchinson, Roger Williams, Thomas Morton, the Quakers, and the Indians banished to Deer Island during King Philip's War. Many of these cases were driven less by the religious violations that may have triggered them than by the establishment of rules for membership in a civil society. Law provided a language for the Puritans to know and say who they were-and who they were not. Banished reveals the Puritans' previously neglected investment in the legal rhetoric that continues to shape our understanding of borders, boundaries, and social exclusion.Exile (Punishment)New EnglandHistory17th centuryCommon lawNew EnglandHistory17th centuryPuritansNew EnglandHistory17th centuryNew EnglandHistoryColonial period, ca. 1600-1775New EnglandCivilization17th centuryAmerican History.American Studies.Cultural Studies.Law.Literature.Exile (Punishment)HistoryCommon lawHistoryPuritansHistory974/.02Goodman Nan1957-1516225MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910788671003321Banished3752556UNINA01093nam0 22002891i 450 UON0007085920231205102350.35209-466-2123-320020107d1991 |0itac50 baengGB|||| |||||Principles of islamic jurisprudenceMohammad Hashim KamaliRevised editionCambridgeIslamic Texts Society1991xxi,417 p.25 cmGIURISPRUDENZA ISLAMICAUONC019732FICambridgeUONL000022342.00917671GIURISPRUDENZA ISLAMICA21KamaliMohammad HashimUONV045587658206MOHAMMAD Hashim KamaliKamali, Mohammad HashimUONV045588ITSOL20250620RICASIBA - SISTEMA BIBLIOTECARIO DI ATENEOUONSIUON00070859SIBA - SISTEMA BIBLIOTECARIO DI ATENEOSI XV 071 SI AA 14697 5 071 Principles of islamic jurisprudence1160072UNIOR