01056nam a2200229 i 450099100330446970753620020503190139.0961112s1884 it ||| | ita b10486410-39ule_instEXGIL118517ExLBiblioteca InterfacoltàitaSiciliani, Pietro127816Lettere del professore Pietro Siciliani, autore della Scienza dell'educazione ... e del professore Pietro Pellizzari, direttore dello Studente magliese.Maglie :tip. del Collegio Capece,1884Esemplare in fotocopia.Pellizzari, Pietro.b1048641002-04-1427-06-02991003304469707536LE002 Fotoc. 301LE002-76853le002-E0.00-no 00000.i1056161427-06-02Lettere del professore Pietro Siciliani, autore della Scienza dell'educazione ... e del professore Pietro Pellizzari, direttore dello Studente magliese214821UNISALENTOle00201-01-96ma -itait 0105103nam 2200565 a 450 991078197090332120230725053551.00-309-21082-81-283-31187-997866133118700-309-21080-1(CKB)2550000000058026(EBL)3564239(SSID)ssj0000533691(PQKBManifestationID)11382311(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000533691(PQKBWorkID)10489325(PQKB)10459619(MiAaPQ)EBC3564239(Au-PeEL)EBL3564239(CaPaEBR)ebr10506520(CaONFJC)MIL331187(OCoLC)758998522(EXLCZ)99255000000005802620111205d2011 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrAchieving nutrient and sediment reduction goals in the Chesapeake Bay[electronic resource] an evaluation of program strategies and implementation /Committee on the Evaluation of Chesapeake Bay Program Implementation for Nutrient Reduction to Improve Water Quality, Water Science and Technology Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National AcademiesWashington, D.C. National Academies Press20111 online resource (258 p.)Description based upon print version of record.0-309-21079-8 Includes bibliographical references.""Front Matter""; ""Preface""; ""Contents""; ""Summary""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 Tracking and Accounting""; ""3 Assessment of the Two-Year Milestones""; ""4 Adaptive Management""; ""5 Strategies for Meeting the Goals""; ""References""; ""Appendixes""; ""Appendix A: Model Estimated Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Sediment Loads by Sector for Five Scenarios""; ""Appendix B: Best Management Practices and Load Reduction Efficiencies Used in the Watershed Model""; ""Appendix C: Details on Tracking and Accounting by Bay Jurisdiction""; ""Appendix D: Two-Year Milestone Implementation, 2009-2010""""Appendix E: Water Science and Technology Board""""Appendix F: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff"""The Chesapeake Bay is North America's largest and most biologically diverse estuary, as well as an important commercial and recreational resource. However, excessive amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment from human activities and land development have disrupted the ecosystem, causing harmful algae blooms, degraded habitats, and diminished populations of many species of fish and shellfish. In 1983, the Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) was established, based on a cooperative partnership among the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the state of Maryland, and the commonwealths of Pennsylvania and Virginia, and the District of Columbia, to address the extent, complexity, and sources of pollutants entering the Bay. In 2008, the CBP launched a series of initiatives to increase the transparency of the program and heighten its accountability and in 2009 an executive order injected new energy into the restoration. In addition, as part of the effect to improve the pace of progress and increase accountability in the Bay restoration, a two-year milestone strategy was introduced aimed at reducing overall pollution in the Bay by focusing on incremental, short-term commitments from each of the Bay jurisdictions. The National Research Council (NRC) established the Committee on the Evaluation of Chesapeake Bay Program Implementation for Nutrient Reduction in Improve Water Quality in 2009 in response to a request from the EPA. The committee was charged to assess the framework used by the states and the CBP for tracking nutrient and sediment control practices that are implemented in the Chesapeake Bay watershed and to evaluate the two-year milestone strategy. The committee was also to assess existing adaptive management strategies and to recommend improvements that could help CBP to meet its nutrient and sediment reduction goals. The committee did not attempt to identify every possible strategy that could be implemented but instead focused on approaches that are not being implemented to their full potential or that may have substantial, unrealized potential in the Bay watershed. Because many of these strategies have policy or societal implications that could not be fully evaluated by the committee, the strategies are not prioritized but are offered to encourage further consideration and exploration among the CBP partners and stakeholders"--Publisher's description.Water quality managementChesapeake Bay Region (Md. and Va.)Water quality management363.7394National Research Council (U.S.)MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910781970903321Achieving nutrient and sediment reduction goals in the Chesapeake Bay3719820UNINA01060nam0 22002771i 450 UON0005120420231205102226.63620020107d1969 |0itac50 bafreFR|||| 1||||ˆLe ‰théatre populair, pourquoi?Emile CopfermannParisMaspero1969214 p.18 cm001UON000675592001 Petite collection Maspero43TEATRO POPOLARESAGGIUONC017501FIFRParisUONL002984IG IX HINTERESSE GENERALE - ARTI - MUSICA, TEATRO, CINEMA, DANZAACOPFERMANNEmileUONV032439529998MasperoUONV246822650ITSOL20240220RICASIBA - SISTEMA BIBLIOTECARIO DI ATENEOUONSIUON00051204SIBA - SISTEMA BIBLIOTECARIO DI ATENEOSI IG IX H 001 SI AR 3111 7 001 Théatre populair, pourquoi1144876UNIOR