01932oam 2200445M 450 991107892480332120200213070650.2(CKB)46357325900041(DGPO)001191521(OCoLC)1064036729(EXLCZ)994635732590004120081210d1952 ua 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierConfirming and establishing the titles of the states to lands beneath navigable waters within state boundaries and to the natural resources within such lands and waters, and provide for the use and control of said lands and resources. May 7, 1952. -- Ordered to be printed[Washington, D.C.] :[U.S. Government Printing Office],1952.1 online resource (3 pages)House report / 82nd Congress, 2nd session. House ;no. 1850[United States congressional serial set] ;[serial no. 11576]Batch processed record: Metadata reviewed, not verified. Some fields updated by batch processes.FDLP item number not assigned.Land titlesLegislative amendmentsPublic landsLegislative materials.lcgftLand titles.Legislative amendments.Public lands.Walter Francis E(Francis Eugene),1894-1963Democrat (PA)1902860WYUWYUOCLCOOCLCQBOOK9911078924803321Confirming and establishing the titles of the states to lands beneath navigable waters within state boundaries and to the natural resources within such lands and waters, and provide for the use and control of said lands and resources. May 7, 1952. -- Ordered to be printed4578524UNINA05665oam 22011174 450 991114899890332120251116163704.097866128445779781462305308146230530X978145187410514518741039781282844575128284457197814527934431452793441(CKB)3170000000055395(EBL)1605988(SSID)ssj0000949426(PQKBManifestationID)11958265(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000949426(PQKBWorkID)10998153(PQKB)11465638(OCoLC)671571359(MiAaPQ)EBC1605988(IMF)WPIEE2009265(IMF)WPIEA2009265WPIEA2009265(EXLCZ)99317000000005539520020129d2009 uf 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrEmerging Economy Responses to the Global Financial Crisis of 2007–09 - An Empirical Analysis of the Liquidity Easing Measures /Etienne Yehoue1st ed.Washington, D.C. :International Monetary Fund,2009.1 online resource (48 p.)IMF Working PapersDescription based upon print version of record.9781451918267 1451918267 Includes bibliographical references.Cover Page; Title Page; Copyright Page; Contents; Glossary; I. Introduction; II. Description of Systemic Liquidity Easing Measures; 1. Emerging Market Countries, Liquidity Supporting Measures; 2. Composition of SLE Measures Implemented; III. On the Determinants of the Systemic Liquidity Easing Measures; 1. Binomial Choice: Probit Regressions for FX Liquidity Measures; 2. Binomial Choice: Probit Regressions for Cross-Country Swap Facilities; 3. Binomial Choice: Probit Regressions for Domestic Liquidity Measures; 4. Multinomial Choice: Ordered Probit Regressions for FX Liquidity Measures5. Multinomial Choice: Ordered Probit Regressions for Domestic Liquidity MeasuresIV. Preliminary Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Measures; 3. Emerging Market Asset Classes; 4. Emerging Market External Bond Spreads; 5. Brazil, Hungary, Korea, and Russia, Interest Rates; 6. Russia's Foreign Exchange Reserves and Rubles per Basket; 7. Russia, Sovereign Bond and CDS Spreads over U.S. Treasuries; 8. Brazil's Foreign Exchange Reserves, Reais per USD, and Reais Implied Volatility; 9. Brazil: Corporate and Sovereign Bond Spreads over U.S. Treasuries10. Korea: FX Reserves, Exchange Rate, Currency Volatility, and CDS Spreads11. Hungary: FX Reserves, Exchange Rate, Currency Volatility and CDS Spreads; V. Policy Issues; VI. Concluding Remarks; References; FootnotesThis paper draws on a unique data set on the nontraditional systemic liquidity easing measures recently undertaken by many emerging market economies. It offers an empirical analysis of the key determinants affecting the decision to undertake these measures over the period September 2008-March 2009. The paper finds that economy size, access to international credit markets, CDS spreads, currency depreciation, and current account balances are among the key factors influencing the adoption of these measures. It provides a rationale for the differences in central bank policy responses, which reflect differences in economic structures rather than conflicting views on fundamental principles. The paper also provides a preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of these measures and points out that despite their positive impacts, they have not fully shielded the real economy from the recent financial meltdown.IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;No. 2009/265Monetary policyBanks and banking, CentralCurrencyimfDebts, ExternalimfDomestic liquidityimfEconomicsimfExchange ratesimfExports and ImportsimfExternal debtimfFinanceimfFinance: GeneralimfForeign ExchangeimfForeign exchangeimfInternational economicsimfInternational Lending and Debt ProblemsimfInvestment DecisionsimfLiquidity indicatorsimfLiquidityimfPortfolio ChoiceimfUnited StatesimfMonetary policy.Banks and banking, Central.CurrencyDebts, ExternalDomestic liquidityEconomicsExchange ratesExports and ImportsExternal debtFinanceFinance: GeneralForeign ExchangeForeign exchangeInternational economicsInternational Lending and Debt ProblemsInvestment DecisionsLiquidity indicatorsLiquidityPortfolio Choice338.54201519233Yehoue Etienne1160516International Monetary Fund.DcWaIMFBOOK9911148998903321Emerging Economy Responses to the Global Financial Crisis of 2007–09 - An Empirical Analysis of the Liquidity Easing Measures4837786UNINA