03003nam 22004453 450 991113411960332120250525090321.01-83711-161-8(MiAaPQ)EBC32127653(Au-PeEL)EBL32127653(CKB)38869632200041(Exl-AI)32127653(OCoLC)1521497615(EXLCZ)993886963220004120250525d2025 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe Supreme Court's Actual Innocence Problem How the Supreme Court of the United States Has Failed to Reduce Wrongful Convictions1st ed.Bradford :Ethics International Press Limited,2025.©2025.1 online resource (194 pages)1-83711-160-X Intro -- Foreword -- By Jennifer Tiedemann -- Preface -- Chapter 1 Introduction -- Chapter 2 Screen Out Unreliable Eyewitnesses -- Chapter 3 Restore Miranda -- Chapter 4 Regulate the Use of Snitches in Courtrooms -- Chapter 5 Hold Prosecutors Accountable -- Chapter 6 Ensure a Competent Defense -- Chapter 7 Expose Junk Science and Junk Scientists -- Chapter 8 Use New Science To Correct Past Mistakes -- Chapter 9 Open the Courthouse Door -- Chapter 10 Crackdown On Entrapment and Outrageous Government Conduct -- Chapter 11 Abolish the Death Penalty ( Capital Sentencing Is Hopelessly Broken -- Chapter 12 Abolish the Death Penalty ( It Will Always Be Barbarous -- Acknowledgements.The author analyzes recent US Supreme Court rulings in all of the areas of constitutional criminal procedure, which wrongful convictions scholars generally agree are most flawed in ways that lead to wrongful convictions. These problem areas include: 1) Eyewitness identification procedures 2) Police interrogations 3) Forensic evidence 4) Informant testimony 5) Indigent defense 6) Prosecutorial Immunity and 7) The rights of inmates to post-conviction actual innocence hearings. He also explains the terrifying phenomenon of wrongful executions, which are inevitable in any nation that tolerates both wrongful convictions and the death penalty. This book makes a unique contribution to the literature on wrongful convictions by explaining how the Supreme Court has failed to adequately respond to the data on inmate exonerations since the DNA Revolution in forensic science. Even when confronted with recent exoneration data, the Supreme Court has continued, in every major area where reform is needed, to minimize and perpetuate the miscarriages of justice.Judicial errorGenerated by AIJudicial ethicsGenerated by AIJudicial errorJudicial ethics345.73Goetting NathanMiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9911134119603321UNINA