02182nam0 2200421 i 450 PAR127326420251003044308.0978880624742320210622d2021 ||||0itac50 baitaitait|||| |||a|z01i xxxe z01nz01ncRDAcarrierˆUn ‰bacio dietro al ginocchioCarmen TotaroTorinoEinaudi2021164 p.23 cmˆUn ‰bacio dietro al ginocchioBMT0024222RMSV7795872835243NARRATIVA ITALIANA2000FIRCSAC058728I853NARRATIVA ITALIANA14853.914NARRATIVA ITALIANA. 1945-20853.92NARRATIVA ITALIANA, 2000-21853.92NARRATIVA ITALIANA, 2000-23Letteratura narrativa italianaNarrativa italianaLetteratura narrativa italianaTotaro, CarmenRMSV779587070620155ITIT-00000020210622IT-BN0095 IT-CE0066 IT-AV0053 IT-NA0792 NAP TLARMADIO 17$NAP 01BCA Comprende monografie e periodici di diritto, testi di ingegneria, di scienze e tecnologia di nuova acquisizione. NAP CVPEZZELLA $NAP MNNARRATIVA $PAR1273264Biblioteca Centralizzata di Ateneo1 v.1 v. in quattro copie 01BCA LETT. 15 01 0000080075 VMA 1 v.Y 20220506202205061 v.1 v. in quattro copie 01BCA LETT. 15 01 0000080085 VMA A4(bis 1 v. (2. copia)Y 20220506202205061 v.1 v. in quattro copie 01BCA LETT. 15 01 0000080095 VMA A4(ter 1 v. (3. copia)Y 20220506202205061 v.1 v. in quattro copie 01BCA LETT. 15 01 0000080105 VMA A4(quater 1 v. (4. copia)Y 2022050620220506 01 CV MN TLBacio dietro al ginocchio2835243UNISANNIO05114nam 22007575 450 991103505160332120251028120412.0978303203825810.1007/978-3-032-03825-8(CKB)41826915700041(MiAaPQ)EBC32378998(Au-PeEL)EBL32378998(DE-He213)978-3-032-03825-8(EXLCZ)994182691570004120251028d2025 u| 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierPsychological Causation in Tort Law Damage Caused by Psychological Influence and Objective Imputation /by Cícero Dantas Bisneto1st ed. 2025.Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :Imprint: Springer,2025.1 online resource (362 pages)Law and Criminology Series9783032038241 1 Introduction -- Part I: Causal Theories and Psychological Causal: A First Approach -- 2 Initial Considerations -- 3 Critical Analysis of Theories of Causation -- Part II: Psychological Causation: Case Studies and Legal Dogmatics -- 4 Psychological Causation -- 5 Application of Theoretical Models to Practical Cases -- 6 Conclusion.This study addresses one of the most challenging problems in contemporary tort law: the attribution of liability in cases where harm results not from direct physical causation, but from psychological influence that motivates or facilitates another person's conduct. Through systematic analysis, this work demonstrates that traditional causal theories—including direct and immediate causation, adequate causation, and the equivalence of conditions (sine qua non)—prove fundamentally inadequate when applied to cases involving "psychological causation." Similarly, the conduct and public statements of government officials can negatively affect citizens' behavior, particularly during periods of crisis. When government officials publicly disregarded mask-wearing protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic, for instance, this foreseeably encouraged non-compliance among the general population. Whether such individuals can be held civilly liable for the resulting harm presents a complex problem requiring careful doctrinal analysis. Equally significant is the question of liability when a group member initiates acts of vandalism or collective violence, subsequently followed by other members of an organized crowd or political group. This raises the fundamental question of whether the person who precipitates a disturbance can be held responsible for damage suffered by third parties, even when the specific perpetrator of a particular injury remains unidentified. Consider, for example, a supporter who initiates an altercation between opposing fans or who physically or verbally assaults members of an organized group, thereby triggering widespread confusion and resulting in harm to bystanders. Particular problems also arise when the consequent damage occurs because the second party, influenced by the conduct of the first agent, deliberately harms themselves or their interests. There are many examples of self-destructive reactions by the injured party after the initial harmful event, such as in cases of revenge porn, bullying, and environmental disasters like Brumadinho and Fukushima. Thus, the victim may, under the impact of the initial harm, prematurely stop their business activities, commit suicide, or refuse necessary treatment measures, such as a blood transfusion, for religious reasons. These scenarios challenge traditional causation theories by introducing psychological mediation between the defendant's conduct and the ultimate harm.Law and Criminology SeriesTortsCommon lawCivil lawLawPhilosophyLawHistoryConflict of lawsConflict of lawsInternational lawComparative lawCommon Tort LawCivil LawTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal HistoryPhilosophy of LawPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative LawTorts.Common law.Civil law.LawPhilosophy.LawHistory.Conflict of laws.Conflict of laws.International law.Comparative law.Common Tort Law.Civil Law.Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.Philosophy of Law.Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law.346.03Dantas Bisneto Cícero1854554MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9911035051603321Psychological Causation in Tort Law4451902UNINA