01227nam 2200325 n 450 99638366210331620221102112847.0(CKB)1000000000593168(EEBO)2240925842(UnM)99866959(EXLCZ)99100000000059316819940427d1659 uy |engurbn||||a|bb|A timely warning, and friendly admonition to the forces in Scotland under General Monck[electronic resource] intended for their information, and to prevent effusion of bloodBy some members of the Army, under the command of the Right Honourable, Major General LambertLondon [s.n.]printed in the year, 1659[2], 6 pAnnotation on Thomason copy: "9ber [i.e. November] 25".Reproduction of the original in the British Library.eebo-0018AdmonitionEarly works to 1800AdmonitionCu-RivESCu-RivESCStRLINWaOLNBOOK996383662103316A timely warning, and friendly admonition to the forces in Scotland under General Monck2366552UNISA02793nam 22004573 450 991102406950332120250728221840.03-11-169755-X3-11-169721-5(CKB)38537966900041(MiAaPQ)EBC32154135(Au-PeEL)EBL32154135(OCoLC)1524428031(BIP)119917963(BIP)120649397(EXLCZ)993853796690004120250617d2025 uy 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierAgainst the Fetishisation of Plural Time Rethinking Ways of Doing a Social History of Time1st ed.Basel/Berlin/Boston :Walter de Gruyter GmbH,2025.©2025.1 online resource (0 pages)Time and Periodization in History Series ;v.33-11-169649-9 Intro -- Preface -- Contents -- Introduction -- Chapter 1 Transition and simultaneity -- Chapter 2 Social-time and Natural-time: Towards Intermeshed Histories -- Chapter 3 Temporal Regimes and Cultures: A Social History of Time -- Conclusions: A Critical Appraisal of Plural Time -- Bibliography.From the viewpoint of social history, is time itself a plural entity or are there multiple forms of engagement in and with it? Pivoted around this question, Sinha attempts to rethink the current theory and practice of history writing by pointing the pitfalls of the growing fetishisation of plurality and the 'plural time' framework. Engaging a range of studies in History, Anthropology, and Sociology, Sinha provides a critical assessment of some of the leading frameworks on time studies, questions their foundational premises, highlights their limitations, and proposes an alternative framework that is attuned to privileging the approach of social history. The purposes of the latter, the book argues, is best served when time's irreversible character is not diluted under the weight of plurality. Plurality in time is an outcome of practices and their historicisation; plurality of time can become an empty statement. Rather than defining what time is, the book casts that inquiry into the historical mould to explore how time, as a contestatory resource, becomes part of social relationships and what it does to them when scripts of power align themselves with the control of time.Time and periodization in history ;v. 3304.237Sinha Nitin1828427MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9911024069503321Against the Fetishisation of Plural Time4396913UNINA