00569nam 2200169z- 450 9910693611403321(CKB)4970000000051054(EXLCZ)99497000000005105420240129c2002uuuu -u- -engSecurities and Exchange Commission : actions needed to improve Public Company Accounting Oversight Board selection processWashington, D.CSecurities And Exchange CommissionDOCUMENT9910693611403321Securities and Exchange Commission3424422UNINA02174oam 2200577zu 450 991101951220332120230421042325.01-280-56082-797866105608203-527-60220-8(CKB)1000000000019213(SSID)ssj0000298009(PQKBManifestationID)11239296(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000298009(PQKBWorkID)10343322(PQKB)10761240(MiAaPQ)EBC4956750(Au-PeEL)EBL4956750(CaONFJC)MIL56082(OCoLC)824553932(EXLCZ)99100000000001921320160829d1993 uy engurcnu||||||||txtccrGuardians of science : fairness and reliability of peer review[Place of publication not identified]VCH19931 online resource (123 pages)Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph3-527-29041-9 An analysis of one of the most controversial issues of modern scientific culture: peer review has been the subject matter of many articles in newspapers and general interest scientific and news magazines. This book considers the necessity of having a reliable method of separating the wheat from the chaff in science, in the light of the large number of recent cases of fraud in science.ResearchEvaluationAnalysisPeer reviewAnalysisTechnical writingAnalysisEvaluationSciences - GeneralHILCCPhysical Sciences & MathematicsHILCCResearchEvaluationAnalysis.Peer reviewAnalysis.Technical writingAnalysisEvaluation.Sciences - GeneralPhysical Sciences & Mathematics507/.2Daniel Hans-Dieter978949Russey William EPQKBBOOK9911019512203321Guardians of science : fairness and reliability of peer review2231462UNINA