02911nam 22004453 450 991100915880332120240725080231.09789400114470(electronic bk.)9789047302292(MiAaPQ)EBC31251633(Au-PeEL)EBL31251633(CKB)33330041300041(Exl-AI)31251633(OCoLC)1450103313(EXLCZ)993333004130004120240725d2024 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierConvention Constitutionalism On the Necessity of Judicial Review by the European Court for European Democratic Governance1st ed.The Hague :Boom Uitgevers Den Haag,2024.©2024.1 online resource (32 pages)Print version: Pierik, Roland Convention Constitutionalism The Hague : Boom Uitgevers Den Haag,c2024 9789047302292 Intro -- Table of Contents -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Legal-Philosophical Background -- 2.1 The Republican Position -- 2.2 The Liberal Position -- 2.3 Republicans and Liberals: A Conclusion -- 3 Between State Power and Competence Creep -- 3.1 The First Phase (1960-1975): the Sleeping Beauty Period -- 3.2 The Second Phase (1975-1995): the Court Finds Its Distinctive Voice -- 3.3 The Third Phase (1995-2011): The State Parties Start Grumbling -- 4 The way Forward. Should the European Court Exercise Weak or Strong Judicial Review? -- 5 Convention Constitutionalism -- 6 Conclusion -- 7 Embedment in the Law Faculty -- 8 Some Words of Thanks -- Bibliography.This book explores the role and necessity of judicial review by the European Court of Human Rights in the context of European democratic governance. It examines the criticism faced by the Court for intervening in national democratic processes and provides a detailed analysis of the nature of rights-based judicial review. It contrasts the republican preference for weak judicial review with the liberal advocacy for strong review, ultimately positioning the Strasbourg Court's approach as a weakened form of strong judicial review. The book also discusses the evolving role of the Court amidst Europe's changing political landscape, emphasizing the importance of a strengthened European consensus on Convention rights. The intended audience includes legal scholars, policymakers, and those interested in European law and human rights.Generated by AI.Judicial reviewGenerated by AIHuman rightsGenerated by AIJudicial reviewHuman rightsPierik Roland1828309MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQ9911009158803321Convention Constitutionalism4396595UNINA