03832nam 22005655 450 991099979070332120250426124710.03-031-88699-210.1007/978-3-031-88699-7(CKB)38641819500041(DE-He213)978-3-031-88699-7(MiAaPQ)EBC32063947(Au-PeEL)EBL32063947(EXLCZ)993864181950004120250426d2025 u| 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierGenesis and Development of French Historical Epistemology A Trajectory Toward Political Epistemology /by Gerardo Ienna1st ed. 2025.Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :Imprint: Springer,2025.1 online resource (X, 242 p. 2 illus.) Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,2215-1958 ;643-031-88698-4 Chapter 1. The Social Genesis of an Intellectual Field -- Chapter 2. Twists and Turns -- Chapter 3. The Socialization and Politicization of Épistemologie Historique -- Chapter 4. Addendum Is there a Canon of Italian Historical Epistemology?.This book forms an important part of the current revival of the debate around the category of historical epistemology. The term “historical epistemology” designates a methodology or research program aimed at building a historically informed theory of knowledge and/or a history of science and technology that enhances its epistemological aspects. This book offers an original panorama of the French debate surrounding the emergence and consolidation of the intellectual program of historical epistemology over a period ranging from the end of the 19th century to the second half of the 20th century. The first section of this book sets out to reconstruct sociologically and historically the processes of circulation of ideas - both nationally and internationally - that constituted the conditions of possibility for the emergence of the very idea of historical epistemology in the French intellectual context. The second section aims instead to highlight the main theoretical positions - both epistemological and historiographical - that would make it possible to trace a relative unity of intent among the authors who make up the canon of historical epistemology (in their oppositional relationship to other intellectual trends). Particular attention is also paid to defining a “minor canon” of this tradition, represented by what is known as “mathematical thought”. The third part of the volume focuses instead on reconstructing the anthropological, sociological and political perspectives underlying the methodology employed by authors belonging to historical epistemology. The three parts combined make for a uniquely broad yet focused book that is of interest to historians, philosophers and scientists alike.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,2215-1958 ;64ScienceHistorySciencePhilosophyPolitical scienceHistory of SciencePhilosophy of SciencePolitics and International StudiesScienceHistory.SciencePhilosophy.Political science.History of Science.Philosophy of Science.Politics and International Studies.509Ienna Gerardoauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1319703MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910999790703321Genesis and Development of French Historical Epistemology4375531UNINA02204nam 2200313 450 99667618270331620250917100559.0978-88-6973-746-620250917d2022----km y0itay5003 baitaITy 00 yNapoli prima di Napolimito e fondazioni della città di PartenopeDaniela Giampaola, Emanuele GrecoRomaSalerno2022203 p. , [8] carte di tav.ill.21 cmPiccoli saggi84Napoli, la città che secondo il mito era sorta dove una sirena si era lasciata morire, conserva, nel nome, il mistero di una doppia fondazione: Neapolis è la città nuova, che succede a Parthenope, il piú antico insediamento di origine cumana. Ma come avvenne tale rifondazione e perché? Per molti anni la ricostruzione storica delle vicende che da Parthenope portarono a Neapolis è stata fissata combinando fonti letterarie e archeologiche da cui si ricavava una data di fondazione successiva alla battaglia di Cuma del 474 a.C. Oggi il quadro di riferimento è radicalmente mutato per effetto dei grandi scavi seguiti al terremoto del 1980 e ai lavori per la metropolitana, con le loro straordinarie scoperte. Questo libro non si limita a definire la cronologia della Città, ma illustra le trasformazioni urbanistiche e architettoniche che interessarono il nucleo originario, permettendoci di riscriverne la storia fino all’età romana, epoca a cui rimanda l’eccezionale scoperta del santuario dei Giochi Isolimpici – i Sebastà –, testimonianza dell’ammirazione dell’imperatore Augusto per la cultura greca che Neapolis conservava come nessun altro centro dell’Italia antica e tutt’ora visibile nell’impianto urbano della “città porosa”. (Fonte: editore)Piccoli saggi84NapoliFondazioneMitiBNCF937.7251GIAMPAOLA,Daniela153275GRECO,Emanuele34154ITcbaREICAT996676182703316IX.5. 101292802 L.M.IX.5.570946BKUMANapoli prima di Napoli3399251UNISA