04311nam 2200661 a 450 991097207960332120200520144314.097866117302229781281730220128173022X9780300129410030012941610.12987/9780300129410(CKB)1000000000471998(StDuBDS)AH23049585(SSID)ssj0000221086(PQKBManifestationID)11186708(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000221086(PQKBWorkID)10160401(PQKB)11104236(Au-PeEL)EBL3419955(CaPaEBR)ebr10169981(CaONFJC)MIL173022(OCoLC)923588868(DE-B1597)485482(OCoLC)952732375(DE-B1597)9780300129410(MiAaPQ)EBC3419955(Perlego)1089636(EXLCZ)99100000000047199820030509d2004 uy 0engur|||||||||||txtccrA philosophy of second language acquisition /Marysia Johnson1st ed.New Haven Yale University Pressc20041 online resource (224 p.)Yale language series9780300100266 0300100264 Includes bibliographical references (p. 191-202) and index.Front matter --Contents --Acknowledgments --Introduction --1. Three Major Scientific Research Traditions --2. Behaviorism and Second Language Learning --3. The Cognitive Tradition and Second Language Acquisition --4. Information Processing Models --5. Communicative Competence Versus Interactional Competence --6. Fundamental Principles of Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory --7. Bakhtin's Dialogized Heteroglossia --8. Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning --9. Building a New Model of Second Language Acquisition --Bibliography --IndexHow does a person learn a second language? In this provocative book, Marysia Johnson proposes a new model of second language acquisition (SLA)a model that shifts the focus from language competence (the ability to pass a language exam) to language performance (using language competently in real-life contexts).Johnson argues that current SLA theory and research is heavily biased in the direction of the cognitive and experimental scientific tradition. She shows that most models of SLA are linear in nature and subscribe to the conduit metaphor of knowledge transfer: the speaker encodes a message, the hearer decodes the sent message. Such models establish a strict demarcation between learners mental and social processes. Yet the origin of second language acquisition is located not exclusively in the learners mind but also in a dialogical interaction conducted in a variety of sociocultural and institutional settings, says the author. Drawing on Vygotskys sociocultural theory and Bakhtins literary theory, she constructs an alternative framework for second language theory, research, teaching, and testing. This approach directs attention toward the investigation of dynamic and dialectical relationships between the interpersonal (social) plane and the intrapersonal (individual) plane. Johnsons model shifts the focus of SLA away from a narrow emphasis on language competence toward a broader view that encompasses the interaction between language competence and performance.Original and controversial, A Philosophy of Second Language Acquisition offers: an introduction to Vygotskys sociocultural theory and Bakhtins literary theory, both of which support an alternative framework for second language acquisition; an examination of the existing cognitive bias in SLA theory and research; a radically new model of second language acquisition.Yale language series.Second language acquisitionSecond language acquisition.418/.001/9Johnson Marysia1958-1808055MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910972079603321A philosophy of second language acquisition4366887UNINA05560nam 22006735 450 991099116380332120250330112912.03-031-86801-310.1007/978-3-031-86801-6(CKB)38166488300041(DE-He213)978-3-031-86801-6(MiAaPQ)EBC31981112(Au-PeEL)EBL31981112(EXLCZ)993816648830004120250330d2025 u| 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierBring Your Own Device Security Policy Compliance Framework /by Rathika Palanisamy, Azah Anir Norman, Miss Laiha Mat Kiah, Tutut Herawan1st ed. 2025.Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :Imprint: Springer,2025.1 online resource (XXII, 196 p. 26 illus., 13 illus. in color.) Information Systems Engineering and Management,3004-9598 ;373-031-86800-5 Introduction -- Bring Your Own Device -- Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses Development -- Research Methodology -- Analysis, Results and Discussion -- Conclusion and Future Work.Proliferation of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) has instigated a widespread change, fast outpacing the security strategies deployed by organizations. The influx of these devices has created information security challenges within organizations, further exacerbated with employees’ inconsistent adherence with BYOD security policy. To prevent information security breaches, compliance with BYOD security policy and procedures is vital. This book aims to investigate the factors that determine employees' BYOD security policy compliance by using mixed methods approach. Security policy compliance factors, BYOD practices and security risks were identified following a systematic review approach. Building on Organizational Control Theory, Security Culture and Social Cognitive Theory, a research framework positing a set of plausible factors determining BYOD security policy compliance was developed. Next, with a purposive sample of eight information security experts from selected public sector organizations, interviews and BYOD risk assessments analysis were performed to furnish in-depth insights into BYOD risks, its impact on organizations and recommend control measures to overcome them. This led to the suggestion of four control measures to mitigate critical BYOD security risks such as Security Training and Awareness (SETA), policy, top management commitment and technical countermeasures. The control measures were mapped into the research framework to be tested in the following quantitative phase. The proposed research framework was tested using survey results from 346 employees of three Critical National Information Infrastructure (CNII) agencies. Using Partial Least Squares – Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), the framework's validity and reliability were evaluated, and hypotheses were tested. Findings show that perceived mandatoriness, self-efficacy and psychological ownership are influential in predicting employees’ BYOD security policy compliance. Specification of security policy is associated with perceived mandatoriness, while BYOD IT support and SETA are significant towards self-efficacy. Unexpectedly, security culture has been found to have no significant relationship to BYOD security policy compliance. Theoretical, practical, and methodological contributions were discussed and suggestions for future research were recommended. The analysis led to a number of insightful findings that contribute to the literature and the management, which are predominantly centered on traditional computing. In view of the ever-increasing BYOD threats to the security of government information, it is imperative that IT managers establish and implement effective policies to protect vital information assets. Consequently, the findings of this study may benefit policymakers, particularly in the public sector, in their efforts to increase BYOD security policy compliance among employees.Information Systems Engineering and Management,3004-9598 ;37EngineeringData processingData protectionComputer securityComputer networksSecurity measuresData EngineeringData and Information SecuritySecurity ServicesPrinciples and Models of SecurityMobile and Network SecurityEngineeringData processing.Data protection.Computer security.Computer networksSecurity measures.Data Engineering.Data and Information Security.Security Services.Principles and Models of Security.Mobile and Network Security.620.00285Palanisamy Rathikaauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1803323Norman Azah Anirauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/autKiah Miss Laiha Matauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/autHerawan Tututauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/autMiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910991163803321Bring Your Own Device Security Policy Compliance Framework4350128UNINA